The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers?
Abstract
This article, and the four that follow, consider some of the ways in which China, Russia, India and Brazil have responded both to US hegemony and to the changing character of international society. This article sets out some of the major analytical questions that emerge when thinking about the foreign policy options of these countries and some of the principal conceptual and theoretical categories within which those questions may be usefully framed. The first section examines the reasons for taking these countries as a group. The second section provides a brief overview of two of the most common theoretical perspectives from which the systemic pressures on these countries have been understood. The third considers their actual and potential strategies and options under five headings: their status as regional powers; their behaviour within and towards international institutions; their relations with the United States; collaboration among them and evidence for the possible emergence of balancing behaviour; and the links between economic development and foreign policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Stability of a Unipolar World
Wohlforth, W. C. (1999) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228899560031 · Cited by 1,241
Soft Balancing against the United States
Pape, R. A. (2005) · International Security · doi:10.1162/0162288054894607 · Cited by 842
Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy
Paul, T. V. (2005) · International Security · doi:10.1162/0162288054894652 · Cited by 510
(2001) · Cited by 185
American Grand Strategy in the Age of Terror
Ikenberry, J. G. (2001) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396330112331343105 · Cited by 110
Peculiar chauvinism or strategic calculation? Explaining the negotiating strategy of a rising India
Narlikar, A. (2006) · International Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00515.x · Cited by 105
Cited by
How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics
NOLTE, D. (2010) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s026021051000135x · Cited by 386
Bower, A. (2015) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1111/misr.12225 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- HURRELL, A.
- Venue
- International Affairs
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0020-5850 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2346
- OpenAlex
- W2018858753
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 94.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00512.x
- The paper
- HURRELL, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00512.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.