The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature presenting the argument that processes of organizational identification (OI) are extremely important in helping to ensure that staff work towards the interests of the organization. There are, however, a number of problems with the way that the notion of OI has been conceptualized and operationalized in the extant literature. This paper examines how OI has been defined and measured over a number of decades. A number of problems are identified with how OI has been conceptualized by researchers, including, for example, issues about whether there is an affective element to identification and how the construct relates to organizational commitment. The paper also includes a review of previous approaches to measuring the concept of OI and raises some key problems with existing research tools. The paper concludes by arguing for a particular conceptualization of OI which helps to clarify the complex relationship between identification and organizational commitment, while at the same time accommodating previous definitions of the construct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS[1]
Guest, D. E. (1987) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00460.x · Cited by 1,353
Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069448 · Cited by 1,352
Cited by
Narcissistic Organizational Identification: Seeing Oneself As Central to the Organization's Identity
Galvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0103 · Cited by 263
Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2010) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.016 · Cited by 157
A picture paints a thousand words: The influence of taking selfies on place identification
Stiglbauer, B., & Weber, S. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.007 · Cited by 23
Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi
Neumann, D., Tiberius, V., & Biendarra, F. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01851-4 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, M. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 207-230
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2086483802
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.