The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future
Abstract
This paper seeks to stimulate debate on the agendas, methodologies and methods used in the field of small business and entrepreneurship. The paper raises questions regarding the research agendas pursued and provides some pointers for the direction of future research. Integral to this is the argument that there is a need to reflect on the condition of small‐business research and to raise the quality of research by employing robust research methods. This may involve questioning the role of small firms and entrepreneurship in society rather than merely advocating them and the policy measures taken when supporting and/or developing the small business sector. The dominance of specific viewpoints, the methodologies used in small business studies, and the consequences of these in relation to the development of a coherent scientific field of small business studies are also discussed. Examples of research activity are discussed to illustrate these themes. Overall, the paper argues that entrepreneurship and small business is a lucrative area for research. However, if the field of inquiry is to flourish, it needs to be approached from a more critical perspective, instead of merely accepting normative, or even strongly ideologically driven, standpoints now dominant in so many studies. This has implications for research agendas, methodologies and ultimately research methods training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
Cope, J. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002 · Cited by 1,118
Entrepreneurial Learning: Past Research and Future Challenges
Wang, C. L., & Chugh, H. (2014) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12007 · Cited by 585
Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/13552551311299288 · Cited by 584
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12005 · Cited by 450
Sex, Gender, and Decisions at the Family → Work Interface
Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350774 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-148
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2130304064
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00254.x
- The paper
- Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A. (2009). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00254.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.