Cited by 233Work-Family Balance ChallengesGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsGender Diversity and Inequality

Sex, Gender, and Decisions at the Family → Work Interface

Powell, Gary N., Greenhaus, Jeffrey H.·2010·Journal of Management

Abstract

What is the linkage between individuals’ sex and the interface between their work and family roles? The answer to this question is by no means straightforward as gender roles, work roles, and family roles evolve. To address the question, the authors examine the influence of family-domain factors on work-domain decisions and their linkages to sex and gender. According to the logic of appropriateness, a theory of decision making, people develop and apply rules in decision-making situations that are consistent with their personal identities. The authors identify three broad types of decisions in the work domain—role entry, participation, and exit decisions—that may be influenced by factors in the family domain according to such rules. Next, they review the literature on the linkage between individuals’ sex and an example of each of these types of decisions: the role entry decision about whether to start a business, the role participation decision about the number of hours to devote to one’s job or business, and the role exit decision about whether to quit a job. The review suggests that (a) family-domain factors mediate effects of sex on work-domain decisions and (b) sex moderates relationships between family-domain factors and work-domain decisions. Based on the review, the authors offer a model of the linkages among sex, family-domain factors, and work-domain decisions that incorporates constructs from theories of the psychology of gender (femininity) and identity theories (family role salience). Finally, the authors offer guidelines for future theory and research to test and extend the model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206309350774

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The family role is more salient in highly feminine people and is tendentially more valued by women, while men tend to value the work role more.

    “Specifically, the family role is more salient in highly feminine people (i.e., the traits often associated with the female gender) and is tendentially more valued by women, while men tend to value the work role more [47, 48].”
  • According to role theory, a person devotes more resources to the role that is most relevant to him or her, investing more effort and resources in maintaining the boundaries of that domain.

    “According to role theory [47], a person devotes more resources to the role that is most relevant to him or her, investing more effort and resources in maintaining the boundaries of that domain [47, 48].”
  • The difference in mediation by direction may have occurred because data collection occurred during confinement, when the whole family was forced to stay at home, increasing stress and boundary violations, especially involving the family at work.

    “This difference may have occurred because the data collection occurred during confinement, a period in which the whole family was forced to stay at home, making this the stage for school, work and play activities, increasing stress, namely boundaries violations, especially involving the family at work [7, 22, 48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2009-12-21
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1011-1039
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2106404959
Cited by
233
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
23.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
work-family interface, sex differences, gender roles, logic of appropriateness, femininity, identity theory, work-family balance, job quitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review