The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A Critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development
Abstract
Based on a stakeholder‐oriented conceptualization of corporate social responsibility (CSR), this paper offers a multi‐dimensional, dynamic perspective which integrates moral, cultural and strategic aspects of the CSR development process, together with its organizational implications. Therefore, the authors link existing stage models of CSR development with stakeholder culture and social responsiveness continuums and provide a consolidative model which highlights a seven‐stage development process towards CSR, articulated around three cultural phases (i.e. CSR reluctance, CSR grasp and CSR embedment). In a context in which literature on CSR development and implementation tends to be overly segmented, this consolidative model integrates organizational values and culture together with management processes and operations. In its emphasis on the importance of the organizational context and characteristics in analyses of organizations' CSR development, the proposed consolidative model offers novel research perspectives and highlights the relevance of adopting a phase‐dependent approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 1×
“Mirvis and Googins’s (2006) proposed CSR stage model relies instead on Greiner’s (1972) organizational growth theory, which implies that organizations move through five stages of growth and require appropriate strategies and structures for each.”
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs
Ellen, P. S. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305284976 · Cited by 1,591 · cited 1×
“In addition, marketing and management scholars have worked extensively to establish potential business rationales for CSR and investigated the effects of CSR commitment on reputation and financial performance (e.g. Burke and Logsdon 1996; Ellen et al. 2006; Margolis and Walsh 2003).”
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Cited by
Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability
Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003 · Cited by 630
Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective
Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615592930 · Cited by 443
Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21726 · Cited by 342
Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire
Hansen, E. G., & Revellio, F. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13016 · Cited by 92
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-38
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2113571606
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 90.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.