Cited by 18Cognitive Abilities and TestingEmployer Branding and e-HRMMedical Education and Admissions

Criterion‐Related Validity of Dutch Police‐Selection Measures and Differences Between Ethnic Groups

Open access
De Meijer, Lonneke A. L., Born, Marise Ph., Terlouw, Gert, Van Der Molen, Henk T.·2008·International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Abstract

This study investigated the criterion‐related validity of cognitive ability as well as non‐cognitive ability measures and differences between ethnic majority (N=2365) and minority applicants (N=682) in Dutch police officer selection. Findings confirmed the relatively low predictive validity of cognitive ability generally found for police jobs. Previous research reported no differential prediction. The present study, however, found small but systematic evidence for differences in validity for the ethnic majority and minority group of both cognitive and non‐cognitive measures. For the minority group, training performance appeared to be mainly predicted by the cognitive ability test. For the majority group, cognitive ability showed very little predictive power. Non‐cognitive ability variables appeared to be somewhat more predictive in this group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00438.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other authors have found that CAT performance was less predictive of training performance for Black recruits.

    “other authors have found that CAT performance was less predictive of training performance for Black recruits (Carretta & Doub, 1998;De Meijer et al., 2008)”

    From Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as De Meijer et al., 2008

    The Main results (§3.2; page not available) state the opposite direction: the cognitive ability test, especially its verbal subtests, was more predictive of training performance for ethnic minority trainees than for ethnic majority trainees. The Discussion (§4; page not available) reports corrected validities of .14 and .04, respectively. The paper describes Dutch ethnic groups, not a separate finding for Black recruits. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cascio, W.F. and Aguinis, H. (2005) Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management (6th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Van der Maesen, P.E.A.M. (1992). Het Rendement van Perso- neelsselectie. [The Efficiency of Personnel Selection]. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Meijer, L. A. L., Born, M. P., Terlouw, G., & Van Der Molen, H. T.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Politieacademie (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-20
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
321-332
ISSN
  • 0965-075X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2389
OpenAlex
W2145697467
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Selection and Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
police selection, criterion validity, predictive validity, cognitive ability tests, training performance, Dutch police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review