The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANALYSIS OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN DYADS: NEW MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES
Abstract
Relational communication refers to the control or dominance aspects of message exchange in dyads, as distinct from an emphasis on the report or referential aspects of communication. In relational communication analysis, the focus is on messages as transactions, and the major theoretic concepts which emerge in this analysis are symmetry, transitory, and complementarity of control. This paper contains a brief review and critique of existing interaction analysis techniques, followed by a detailed discussion of new measurement procedures that capture both the control and processual (time-varying) nature of dyadic interaction. The first step in these procedures yields a code (by speaker) based on the grammatical format of each sequential utterance. The second step yields a translation of each message format and response made into a control code, based on the relationship between the message and its immediate predecessor. These codes are next translated into transactional codes, which can then be analyzed in terms of the three major theoretic concepts. These measurement procedures require minimal subjective judgment, particularly at the initial coding level. The paper concludes with a discussion of the ways we are attempting to operationalize major “themes” or patterns of control in lengthy, ongoing dyadic exchanges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2002) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00099-x · Cited by 613
A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRUST, DISCLOSURE, AND INTERPERSONAL SOLIDARITY
WHEELESS, L. R. (1978) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00604.x · Cited by 417
Mead, N., Bower, P., & Hann, M. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00171-x · Cited by 275
DUCK, S., RUTT, D. J., HOY, M., & STREJC, H. H. (1991) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00545.x · Cited by 252
Manne, S., Sherman, M., Ross, S., Ostroff, J., Heyman, R. E., & Fox, K. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.4.660 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- ROGERS, L. E., & FARACE, R. V.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 222-239
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2095657054
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 74.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANALYSIS OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN DYADS: NEW MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.x
- The paper
- ROGERS, L. E., & FARACE, R. V. (1975). ANALYSIS OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN DYADS: NEW MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.