The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRUST, DISCLOSURE, AND INTERPERSONAL SOLIDARITY
Abstract
This study conceptualized perceived trustworthiness of the individual, self-disclosure to the individual, perceived trustworthiness of people in general, and disclosive tendencies to other people in general to be indicants of a broader construct of trust. Self-disclosure and perceived trustworthiness of the individual were found to be related constructs assessing differential aspects of the trust construct. Likewise, self-disclosure and perceived trustworthiness of the individual were found to be criterial attributes of interpersonal solidarity. These communication-related phenomena indicated the solidarity of interpersonal relationships. In the progress of the research, a 20-item measure of perceived interpersonal solidarity was developed as a criterion for assessing the impact of communication-related variables on interpersonal relationships. Other exploratory research issues were investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust1
Rotter, J. B. (1967) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x · Cited by 3,503
BERGER, C. R., & CALABRESE, R. J. (1975) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x · Cited by 3,006
(1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,836
(2017) · Managerial Leadership for Librarians · doi:10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003 · Cited by 2,240
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
Newcomb, T. M. (1961) · doi:10.1037/13156-000 · Cited by 1,707
Self-disclosure: A literature review.
Cozby, P. C. (1973) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0033950 · Cited by 1,252
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 1,081
Self-Disclosure: An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self
Jourard, S. M. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,071
Giffin, K. (1967) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0024833 · Cited by 933
Cited by
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x · Cited by 1,242
Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers
Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209566 · Cited by 842
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650205285368 · Cited by 701
Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Ferris, A. L. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055 · Cited by 398
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210377091 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- WHEELESS, L. R.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-157
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2050844447
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRUST, DISCLOSURE, AND INTERPERSONAL SOLIDARITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00604.x
- The paper
- WHEELESS, L. R. (1978). A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRUST, DISCLOSURE, AND INTERPERSONAL SOLIDARITY. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00604.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
