The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nature of Conversational Involvement and Nonverbal Encoding Patterns
Abstract
Conversational involvement refers to the degree to which participants in a communicative exchange are cognitively and behaviorially engaged in the topic, relationship, and/or situation. It is argued that involvement should be viewed from a functional perspective and conceptualized as entailing fiue dimensions: immediacy, expressiveness, interaction management, altercentrism, and social anxiety. Specific nonverbal behaviors that are actually encoded to express involvement along these five dimensions are examined within an interview context. Unacquainted dyads (N=52) engaged in baseline interviews followed by a second interview in which one participant was asked to increase or decrease involvement significantly. Tiuentyone kinesic, proxemic, and vocalic behaviors were rated during five intervals. Change scores from baseline to manipulations shouted numerous differences between high and low involvement, as did correlations between magnitude of involvement and nonverbal behaviors. The behaviors that most strongly discriminated high from low involvement were general kinesic/proxemic attentiveness, forward lean, relaxed laughter, coordinated speech, fewer silences and latencies, and fewer object manipulations. Behaviors most predictive of magnitude of involvement change were facial animation, vocal warmth/interest, deeper pitch, less random movement, and more vocal attentiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator.
Mehrabian, A. (1968) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025906 · Cited by 259
Cited by
The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling.
LaFrance, M., Hecht, M. A., & Paluck, E. L. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.305 · Cited by 514
Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x04273036 · Cited by 435
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x · Cited by 400
Self-citationBURGOON, J. K., & Le POIRE, B. A. (1993) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00316.x · Cited by 359
Self-citationCroes, E. A. J., & Antheunis, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520959463 · Cited by 291
“Furthermore, these interactions involve communications who come across as friendly and pleasant (Coker & Burgoon, 1987).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- COKER, D. A., & BURGOON, J.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-494
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2104899019
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Conversational Involvement and Nonverbal Encoding Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x
- The paper
- COKER, D. A., & BURGOON, J. (1987). The Nature of Conversational Involvement and Nonverbal Encoding Patterns. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.