Cited by 43Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Diverse Supernatural Portfolios: Certitude, Exclusivity, and the Curvilinear Relationship Between Religiosity and Paranormal Beliefs

Baker, Joseph O., Draper, Scott·2010·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Studies have attempted to understand the association between more conventional supernatural (religious) beliefs and practices and less conventional “paranormal” supernatural beliefs. Some have posited that the two comprise incompatible cultural spheres and belief systems, while others have argued that supernatural religious beliefs are “small steps” toward less conventional paranormal views (such as belief in astrology and telekinesis). We build upon recent scholarship outlining a more nuanced, nonlinear relationship between religiosity and paranormal beliefs by identifying a specific niche of believers who are particularly likely to dabble in unconventional supernatural beliefs. Strong believers in the paranormal tend to be characterized by a nonexclusive spiritualist worldview, as opposed to materialist or exclusive religious outlooks. Paranormal believers tend to be characterized by moderate levels of religious belief and practice, and low levels of ideological exclusivity. In general, the relationship between more conventional religiosity and paranormal beliefs is best conceptualized as curvilinear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01519.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of belief in paranormal and otherwise supramundane but non-religious phenomena such as ghosts, UFOs and other mythical creatures remain as high as ever.

    “Rather, rates of belief in paranormal and otherwise supramundane but non-religious phenomena such as ghosts, UFOs and other mythical creatures remain as high as ever (Baker and Draper 2010; Persinger 2001; Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”

    From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as Baker and Draper 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, J. O., & Draper, S.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, Joseph O.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
413-424
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043293048
Cited by
43
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
supernatural beliefs, religiosity, spiritualism, curvilinear relationship, astrology, telekinesis, materialism, belief systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review