The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu's Habitus
Abstract
This paper aims to balance the conceptual reception of Bourdieu's sociology in the United States through a conceptual re‐examination of the concept of Habitus. I retrace the intellectual lineage of the Habitus idea, showing it to have roots in Claude Levi‐Strauss structural anthropology and in the developmental psychology of Jean Piaget, especially the latter's generalization of the idea of operations from mathematics to the study of practical, bodily‐mediated cognition. One important payoff of this exercise is that the common misinterpretation of the Habitus as an objectivist and reductionist element in Bourdieu's thought is dispelled. The Habitus is shown to be instead a useful and flexible way to concep‐tualize agency and the ability to transform social structure. Thus ultimately one of Bourdieu's major contributions to social theory consists of his development of a new radical form of cognitive sociology, along with an innovative variety of multilevel sociological explanation in which the interplay of different structural orders is highlighted. In keeping with the usual view, the goal of sociology is to uncover the most deeply buried structures of the different social worlds that make up the social universe, as well as the "mechanisms" that tend to ensure their reproduction or transformation. Merging with psychology, though with a kind of psychology undoubtedly quite different from the most widely accepted image of this science, such an exploration of the cognitive structures that agents bring to bear in their practical knowledge of the social worlds thus structured. Indeed there exists a correspondence between social structures and mental structures, between the objective divisions of the social world . . . and the principles of vision and division that agents apply to them (Bourdieu, 1996b[1989], p. 1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Cited by
Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003 · Cited by 391
Self-citationCan Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?
Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O. (2010) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2010.0009 · Cited by 364
Self-citationEdgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2014) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878514530231 · Cited by 334
Bonikowski, B. (2016) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074412 · Cited by 320
Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory
Cardinale, I. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0020 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- LIZARDO, O.
- Venue
- Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-401
- ISSN
- 0021-8308 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5914
- OpenAlex
- W2091742092
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu's Habitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x
- The paper
- LIZARDO, O. (2004). The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu's Habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.