The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,154
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801 · cited 2×
“…all attempts to suggest that persons somehow imbibe or internalize overarching, historically 7 A reviewer suggested certain obvious commonalities between the toolkit formulation of scaffolded cognition and anthropological and sociological theories of ‘‘distributed cognition’’ (e.g. Hutchins, 1995).”
Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0239 · Cited by 9,866
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Cited by
Lizardo, O. (2017) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122416675175 · Cited by 507
Self-citationPatterson, O. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123 · Cited by 399
Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change
Carstensen, M. B. (2011) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773910000342 · Cited by 316
Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory
Cardinale, I. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0020 · Cited by 257
What are dual process models? implications for cultural analysis in sociology.
Lizardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D. S., Taylor, M. A., Van Ness, J., & Wood, M. (2016) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275116675900 · Cited by 245
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lizardo, O., & Strand, M.
- Venue
- Poetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-228
- ISSN
- 0304-422X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092760199
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003
- The paper
- Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010). Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
