The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are rocks still water‐wet in the presence of dense CO2 or H2S?
Abstract
The various modes of acid gas storage in aquifers, namely structural, residual, and local capillary trapping, are effective only if the rock remains water‐wet. This paper reports an evaluation, by means of the captive‐bubble method, of the water‐wet character in presence of dense acid gases (CO 2, H 2 S) of typical rock‐forming minerals such as mica, quartz, calcite, and of a carbonate‐rich rock sampled from the caprock of a CO 2 storage reservoir in the South‐West of France. The method, which is improved from that previously implemented with similar systems by Chiquet et al. (Geofluids 2007; 7: 112), allows the advancing and receding contact angles, as well as the adhesion behavior of the acid gas on the mineral substrate, to be evaluated over a large range of temperatures (up to 140°C), pressures (up to 150 bar), and brine salinities (up to NaCl saturation) representative of various geological storage conditions. The water‐receding (or gas‐advancing) angle that controls structural and local capillary trapping is observed to be not significantly altered in the presence of dense CO 2 or H 2 S. In contrast, some alteration of the water‐advancing (or gas‐receding) angle involved in residual trapping is observed, along with acid gas adhesion, particularly on mica. A spectacular wettability reversal is even observed with mica and liquid H 2 S. These results complement other recent observations on similar systems and present analogies with the wetting behavior of crude oil/brine/mineral systems, which has been thoroughly studied over the past decades. An insight is given into the interfacial forces that govern wettability in acid gas‐bearing aquifers, and the consequences for acid gas geological storage are discussed along with open questions for future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ali, M., Jha, N. K., Pal, N., Keshavarz, A., Hoteit, H., & Sarmadivaleh, M. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103895 · Cited by 490
Hydrogen Wettability of Sandstone Reservoirs: Implications for Hydrogen Geo‐Storage
Iglauer, S., Ali, M., & Keshavarz, A. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl090814 · Cited by 353
Contamination of silica surfaces: Impact on water–CO2–quartz and glass contact angle measurements
Iglauer, S., Salamah, A., Sarmadivaleh, M., Liu, K., & Phan, C. (2014) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.006 · Cited by 286
Al-Yaseri, A. Z., Lebedev, M., Barifcani, A., & Iglauer, S. (2016) · The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics · doi:10.1016/j.jct.2015.07.031 · Cited by 278
The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage
Bourg, I. C., Beckingham, L. E., & DePaolo, D. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03003 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- BROSETA, D., TONNET, N., & SHAH, V.
- Venue
- Geofluids
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 280-294
- ISSN
- 1468-8115 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-8123
- OpenAlex
- W1957847975
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are rocks still water‐wet in the presence of dense CO2 or H2S? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2012.00369.x
- The paper
- BROSETA, D., TONNET, N., & SHAH, V. (2012). Are rocks still water‐wet in the presence of dense CO2 or H2S? Geofluids. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2012.00369.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.