The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The economic burden of Clostridium difficile
Open accessAbstract
Although Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitalized patients, the economic burden of this major nosocomial pathogen for hospitals, third-party payers and society remains unclear. We developed an economic computer simulation model to determine the costs attributable to healthcare-acquired C. difficile infection (CDI) from the hospital, third-party payer and societal perspectives. Sensitivity analyses explored the effects of varying the cost of hospitalization, C. difficile-attributable length of stay, and the probability of initial and secondary recurrences. The median cost of a case ranged from $9179 to $11 456 from the hospital perspective, $8932 to $11 679 from the third-party payor perspective, and $13 310 to $16 464 from the societal perspective. Most of the costs incurred were accrued during a patient’s primary CDI episode. Hospitals with an incidence of 4.1 CDI cases per 100 000 discharges would incur costs ≥$3.2 million (hospital perspective); an incidence of 10.5 would lead to costs ≥$30.6 million. Our model suggests that the annual US economic burden of CDI would be ≥$496 million (hospital perspective), ≥$547 million (third-party payer perspective) and ≥$796 million (societal perspective). Our results show that C. difficile infection is indeed costly, not only to third-party payers and the hospital, but to society as well. These results are consistent with current literature citing C. difficile as a costly disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019
(U.S.), C. F. D. C. A. P. (2019) · doi:10.15620/cdc:82532 · Cited by 5,782
European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Tilg, H., Rajilić-Stojanović, M., Kump, P., Satokari, R., Sokol, H., Arkkila, P., Pintus, C., Hart, A., et al. (2017) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 · Cited by 1,207
Global economic burden of Chagas disease: a computational simulation model
Lee, B. Y., Bacon, K. M., Bottazzi, M. E., & Hotez, P. J. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70002-1 · Cited by 616
Self-citationCammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Kelly, C. R., Mullish, B. H., Allegretti, J. R., Kassam, Z., Putignani, L., Fischer, M., Keller, J. J., Costello, S. P., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548 · Cited by 506
Aby, E. S., Vaughn, B. P., Enns, E. A., & Rajasingham, R. (2022) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciac207 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- McGlone, S. M., Bailey, R. R., Zimmer, S. M., Popovich, M. J., Tian, Y., Ufberg, P., Muder, R. R., & Lee, B. Y.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-289
- ISSN
- 1198-743X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1795785110
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The economic burden of Clostridium difficile. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03571.x
- The paper
- McGlone, S. M., Bailey, R. R., Zimmer, S. M., Popovich, M. J., Tian, Y., Ufberg, P., Muder, R. R., & Lee, B. Y. (2012). The economic burden of Clostridium difficile. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03571.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.