Cited by 28Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGut microbiota and health

Cost-effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for First Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

Open access
Aby, Elizabeth S, Vaughn, Byron P, Enns, Eva A, Rajasingham, Radha·2022·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both the American College of Gastroenterology and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) guidelines recommend fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for persons with multiple recurrent CDI. Emerging data suggest that FMT may have high cure rates when used for first recurrent CDI. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of FMT for first recurrent CDI. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to simulate a cohort of patients presenting with initial CDI infection. The model estimated the costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of different CDI treatment regimens recommended in the 2021 IDSA guidelines, with the additional option of FMT for first recurrent CDI. The model includes stratification by the severity of initial infection, estimates of cure, recurrence, and mortality. Data sources were taken from IDSA guidelines and published literature on treatment outcomes. Outcome measures were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: When FMT is available for first recurrent CDI, the optimal cost-effective treatment strategy is fidaxomicin for initial nonsevere CDI, vancomycin for initial severe CDI, and FMT for first and subsequent recurrent CDI, with an ICER of $27 135/QALY. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a $100 000 cost-effectiveness threshold, FMT for first and subsequent CDI recurrence was cost-effective 90% of the time given parameter uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: FMT is a cost-effective strategy for first recurrent CDI. Prospective evaluation of FMT for first recurrent CDI is warranted to determine the efficacy and risk of recurrence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciac207

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]34. Mora Pinzon M, Buie R, Liou J, et al. Outcomes of community and healthcare-onset Clostridium difficile Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 68:1343–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [55]55. Cammarota G, Masucci L, Ianiro G, et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:835–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [63]63. CMS.gov. In: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, ed. 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD. 21244. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aby, E. S., Vaughn, B. P., Enns, E. A., & Rajasingham, R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vaughn, Byron P
  • Rajasingham, Radha
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2022-03-11
Volume
75
Issue
9
Pages
1602-1609
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W4220946700
Cited by
28
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI13885, K25AI118476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, cost-effectiveness, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, Markov model, quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, infection severity, treatment strategy comparison
MeSH terms
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Clostridium Infections, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Recurrence, Clostridioides difficile, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review