Cited by 151Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels

O'Brien, T. G., Baillie, J. E. M., Krueger, L., Cuke, M.·2010·Animal Conservation

Abstract

Although recent biodiversity loss has been compared with cataclysmic mass extinctions, we still possess few indicators that can assess the extent or location of biodiversity loss on a global scale. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has mandated development of indicators that can meet the needs of monitoring biodiversity by 2010. To date, many indicators rely on unwarranted assumptions, secondary data, expert opinion and retrospective time series. We present a new biodiversity indicator, the Wildlife Picture Index (WPI) that targets medium and large‐sized terrestrial birds and mammals in forested and savannah ecosystems that. The WPI is a composite indicator based on the geometric mean of relative occupancy estimates derived from camera trap sampling at a landscape scale. It has been designed to meet the needs of a CBD indicator while avoiding many of the pitfalls that characterize some CBD indicators. We present an example using 8 years of camera trap data from Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Indonesia to show that the WPI is capable of detecting changes in the rate of loss of biodiversity, a key requirement of a CBD indicator. We conclude that the WPI should be effective at monitoring top trophic levels in forest and savannah ecosystems using primary data and can fill the gap in knowledge about trends in tropical biodiversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00357.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Brien, T. G., Baillie, J. E. M., Krueger, L., & Cuke, M.
Affiliations
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Venue
Animal Conservation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-23
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
335-343
ISSN
  • 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1795
OpenAlex
W1827162315
Cited by
151
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
biodiversity indicators, medium and large mammals, composite index, Convention on Biological Diversity, biodiversity loss, tropical forest ecosystems, savanna ecosystems, Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review