Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of a panel of highly variable minisatellites cloned from human DNA

WONG, Z., WILSON, V., PATEL, I., POVEY, S., JEFFREYS, A. J.·1987·Annals of Human Genetics

Abstract

Summary: Five of the most variable loci detected in human DNA by hybridization with DNA fingerprint probes have been cloned and characterized. Each locus consists of a tandem‐repetitive minisatellite, with repeat units ranging in length from 9 to 45 base pairs depending on the locus. All of these cloned minisatellites act as locus‐specific hybridization probes, and detect extremely variable Mendelian loci with heterozygosities ranging from 90 to 99%. These five hypervariable loci, together with a previously‐isolated minisatellite designated pΛg3, are dispersed over four autosomes (chromosomes 1, 5, 7 and 12). Syntenic pairs on chromosomes 1 and 7 show no detectable pair‐wise linkage, and thus these hypervariable loci show no evidence of clustering within the genome and should provide valuable markers for mapping inherited disease. The locus‐specific minisatellites act as very sensitive hybridization probes, and can be pooled to detect several hypervariable loci simultaneously. The applications of these probes in individual identification, paternity testing and analysis of cell chimaerism are discussed, and are illustrated by an analysis of forensic specimens from two victims who had been sexually assaulted and murdered. We are very grateful to Professor J. Dausset and Dr H. Cann at the Human Polymorphism Study Centre, Paris. for the generous provision of DNA samples from the panel of CEPH families, to Dr Mary Davis for providing DNA from the JDA hybrids, and also to the following people who kindly allowed us to use their hybrids. Dr Ellen Solomon. Dr Nigel Spurr. Dr P. Goodfellow, Dr Denise Sheer, Dr John Cowell and Dr Ben Carritt. We also thank Anabel Kearney who did the enzyme analysis on the hybrids, and Lynne West who did the karyotyping. We are also grateful to the Leicestershire Constabulary for their permission to cite details of the forensic analysis. A.J.J. is a Lister Institute Research Fellow, and this work was supported by a grant to A.J.J. from the Medical Research Council. The minisatellite probes are the subject of Patent Applications, and commercial enquiries should be addressed to the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Brockley Hill, Stanmore. Middlesex, H A7 4JD, U.K.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1987.tb01062.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
WONG, Z., WILSON, V., PATEL, I., POVEY, S., & JEFFREYS, A. J.
Venue
Annals of Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
269-288
ISSN
  • 0003-4800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1809
OpenAlex
W2044228748
Cited by
522
References
0
FWCI
22.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.