The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of chemical communication in mate choice
Abstract
Chemical signals are omnipresent in sexual communication in the vast majority of living organisms. The traditional paradigm was that their main purpose in sexual behaviour was to coordinate mate and species recognition and thus pheromones were conserved in structure and function. In recent years, this view has been challenged by theoretical analyses on the evolution of pheromones and empirical reports of mate choice based on chemical signals. The ability to measure precisely the quantity and quality of chemicals emitted by single individuals has also revealed considerable individual variation in chemical composition and release rates, and there is mounting evidence that prospecting mates respond to this variation. Here, we review the evidence for pheromones as indicators of mate quality and examine the extent of their use in individual mate assessment. We begin by briefly defining the levels of mate choice – species recognition, mate recognition and mate assessment. We then explore the degree to which pheromones satisfy the key criteria necessary for their evolution and maintenance as cues in mate assessment; that is, they should exhibit variation across individuals within a sex and species; they should honestly reflect an individual’s quality and thus be costly to produce and/or maintain; they should display relatively high levels of heritability. There is now substantial empirical evidence that pheromones can satisfy all these criteria and, while measurements of the actual metabolic cost of pheromone production remain to some degree lacking, trade‐offs between pheromone production and various fitness‐related characters such as growth rate, immunocompetence and longevity have been reported for a range of species. In the penultimate section, we outline the growing number of studies where the consequences of chemical‐based mate assessment have been investigated, specifically focussing on the reported direct and genetic benefits accrued by the receiver. Finally, we highlight potential areas for future research and in particular emphasise the need for interdisciplinary research that combines exploration of chemical, physiological and behavioural processes to further our understanding of the role of chemical cues in mate assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach
Ormond, R. F. G., Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1983) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4581 · Cited by 2,895
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
Biological signals as handicaps
Grafen, A. (1990) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8 · Cited by 2,462
Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871–1971
(1975) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(75)90107-4 · Cited by 2,300
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits
Lande, R. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721 · Cited by 2,200
FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns
Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C. (1986) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002135 · Cited by 1,701
The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0207 · Cited by 1,455
Cited by
Metcalfe, N. B., & Alonso‐Alvarez, C. (2010) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01750.x · Cited by 558
The evolution of pheromone diversity
Symonds, M. R. E., & Elgar, M. A. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.009 · Cited by 374
Female chemical signalling underlying reproduction in mammals
Coombes, H. A., Stockley, P., & Hurst, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-018-0981-x · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansson, B. G., & Jones, T. M.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-16
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2129724893
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 180
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of chemical communication in mate choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00009.x
- The paper
- Johansson, B. G., & Jones, T. M. (2007). The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00009.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.