The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns
Abstract
With these words Darwin opened a brief paragraph citing observations antithetical to his supposition: anecdotal reports of the inheritance of characters missing from one side of the body. His initial hunch, however, has stood the test of time: Genetic studies have confirmed that where only small, random deviations from bilateral symmetry exist, the deviations in a particular direction have little or no measurable heritability (17, 47, 51, 65a, 73a, 74, 91). The genetic basis of bilateral symmetry thus appears to differ fundamentally from that of virtually all other morphological features. Why, then, all the recent (and not so recent) interest in such minor, nondirectional deviations from bilateral symmetry [fluctuating asymmetry (FA); 60 cited in 99]? Four reasons. First, FA relates in a curious way to what is perhaps the major unsolved general problem in modem biology: the orderly expression of genotypes as complex, three-dimensional phenotypes. As was emphasized in a flurry of activity in the mid to late 1950s, and many times since, FA provides an appealing measure of 'developmental noise,' or minor environmentally induced departures from some ideal developmental program (101). Its appeal derives from an a priori knowledge of the ideal: perfect bilateral symmetry. For unilateral characters, the ideal is rarely known (but see 1, 2, and 59 for one possible approach). A second reason for interest in
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although departures from symmetry are a property of the individual, patterns of asymmetry are studied at the level of the (sub)sample and are grouped into three categories, directional asymmetry, fluctuating asymmetry, and antisymmetry (Palmer & Strobeck, 1986;Palmer, 1994).”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Palmer & Strobeck, 1986
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability
Bulmer, M. G. (1971) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282718 · Cited by 989
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry
Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,109
Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes
Mardia, K. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.2.285 · Cited by 405
(1993) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1993.0144 · Cited by 143
Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice
Hallgrímsson, B., Willmore, K., Dorval, C., & Cooper, D. M. L. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21002 · Cited by 134
Singh, N., Harvati, K., Hublin, J.-J., & Klingenberg, C. P. (2012) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.006 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1986-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 391-421
- ISSN
- 0066-4162
- Cited by
- 1,701
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review