Cited by 51Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionEducational theories and practicesEducation, Philosophy, and Society

Directions for Mind, Brain, and Education: Methods, Models, and Morality

Stein, Zachary, Fischer, Kurt W.·2011·Educational Philosophy and Theory

Abstract

In this article we frame a set of important issues in the emerging field of Mind, Brain, and Education in terms of three broad headings: methods, models, and morality. Under the heading of methods we suggest that the need for synthesis across scientific and practical disciplines entails the pursuit of usable knowledge via a catalytic symbiosis between theory, research, and practice. Under the heading of models the goal of producing usable knowledge should shape the construction of theories that provide comprehensive accounts of human learning and development spanning multiple levels of analysis. Under the heading of morality usable knowledge must be put to good use: Its application and dissemination ought to be infused with moral considerations gleaned from dialogue among all those potentially affected. Generally, the field should be shaped not only by its constituent scientific disciplines but also by its applications to education and learning. Thus we argue for the adoption of a kind of pragmatism that would be best actualized by building research‐school collaborations between researchers and practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00708.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Stein, Z., & Fischer, K. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Published
2011-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
56-66
ISSN
  • 0013-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5812
OpenAlex
W1981658716
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Philosophy and Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational theories and practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
usable knowledge, levels of analysis, pragmatism, interdisciplinary research, research dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review