The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three‐dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption
Open accessAbstract
Normal and abnormal jaw growth and tooth eruption are topics of great importance for several dental and medical disciplines. Thus far, clinical studies on these topics have used two‐dimensional (2D) radiographic techniques. The purpose of the present study was to analyse normal mandibular growth and tooth eruption in three dimensions based on computer tomography (CT) scans, extending the principles of mandibular growth analysis proposed by Björk in 1969 from two to three dimensions. As longitudinal CT data from normal children are not available (for ethical reasons), CT data from children with Apert syndrome were employed, because it has been shown that the mandible in Apert syndrome is unaffected by the malformation, and these children often have several craniofacial CT scans performed during childhood for planning of cranial and midface surgery and for follow‐up after surgery. A total of 49 datasets from ten children with Apert syndrome were available for study. The number of datasets from each individual ranged from three to seven. The first CT scan in each of the ten series was carried out before 1 year of age, and the ages for the 49 scans ranged from 1 week to 14.5 years. The mandible and the teeth were segmented and iso‐surfaces generated. Landmarks were placed on the surface of the mandible, along the mandibular canals, the inner contour of the cortical plate at the lower border of the symphysis menti, and on the teeth. Superimposition of the mandibles in the longitudinal series was performed using the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as suggested by Björk. The study supported the findings of stability of the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as seen in profile view previously reported by Björk & Skieller in 1983. However, the mandibular canals were, actually, relocated laterally during growth. Furthermore, the position of tooth buds remained relatively stable inside the jaw until root formation started. Eruption paths of canines and premolars were vertical, whereas molars erupted in a lingual direction. The 3D method would seem to offer new insight into jaw growth and tooth eruption, but further studies are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rotational growth alters the spatial relationship between the implant and adjacent teeth.
“The rotational growth alters the spatial relationship between the implant and adjacent teeth [64].”
From Outcomes of dental implant treatment in 3–18 year old children with ectodermal dysplasia: a systematic review spanning three decades (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
The Mandibular growth and Discussion passages describe jaw remodelling, canal shifts and tooth eruption, but do not address rotational growth changing the position of an implant relative to adjacent teeth. A search for implant-related passages found only metallic implants used as reference markers in earlier growth studies (Introduction; Fig. 1 caption), not the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1097/00001665-199001030-00001 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001665-200011030-00002 · DOI
- 10.1109/42.896780 · DOI
- Björk A, 1951, Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth, Angle Orthod, 21, 3
- 10.3109/00016355509028170 · DOI
- BjörkA(1966)Käkarnas tillväxt och utveckling i relation till kraniet i dess helhet. InNordisk Klinisk Odontologi I–V I 1(edsHolstJJ ØstbyBN OsvaldO) pp.1–44. Copenhagen: Forlaget for Faglitteratur.
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330290217 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(68)90179-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/ejo/5.1.1 · DOI
- Broadbent BH, 1931, A new x‐ray technique and its application to orthodontia, Angle Orthod, 1, 45
- Bro‐Nielsen M, 1996, Computer Assisted Radiology, 921
- Bro‐Nielsen M, 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205, 3
- Carlsen O, 1987, Dental Morphology
- 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600389 · DOI
- Cohen MM, 2000, Craniosynostosis. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management, 316
- Dahlberg G, 1940, Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students
- Dryden IL, 1998, Statistical Shape Analysis
- 10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0299:AMFTPI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- HilgerKB LarsenP KreiborgS DarvannTA MarshJL(2003)Active shape analysis of mandibular growth. InMedical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2003(edsEllisRE PetersTM) pp.902–909. Berlin: Springer Uerlag. · DOI
- Hofrath H, 1931, Die Bedeutung der Röntgenfern‐ und Abstandsaufnahme für die Diagnostik der. Kieferanomalien, Fortschr Orthod, 1, 232
- 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6 · DOI
- IDL Research Systems, 1997, Interactive Data Language
- 10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0117:DDIAS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006534-200008000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1259/dmfr.1977.0015 · DOI
- Kreiborg S, 1985, The application of roentgencephalometry to the study of craniofacial anomalies, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl, 1, 31
- Kreiborg S, 1992, The oral manifestations of Apert syndrome, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol, 12, 41
- 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80478-0 · DOI
- Kreiborg S, 1996, En ny metode til tredimensional analyse af tanddannelse og ‐eruption, Tandlægebladet, 100, 57
- Kreiborg S, 1996, Computer Assisted Radiology, 1066
- Kreiborg S, 1999, Cephalometric study of the Apert syndrome in adolescence and adulthood, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol, 19, 1
- Kreiborg S, 2001, Orthodontics at the Turn of the Century, 181
- 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0190:ODIUCS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Marsh JL, 1983, Surface imaging from computerized tomographic scans, Surgery, 94, 159
- Marsh JL, 1991, The craniofacial anatomy of Apert syndrome, Clin Plast Surg, 18, 237, 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30820-8 · DOI
- Press WH, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing
- 10.1016/0002-9416(58)90012-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02174360 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00429-003-0343-4 · DOI
- Ricketts RM, 1981, Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics, Angle Orthod, 51, 115
- SchleidtDT(2002)Validation of three‐dimensional craniofacial imaging of computed tomography.Thesis.University of Copenhagen.
- Solow B, 1966, The pattern of craniofacial association. A morphological and methodological correlation and factor analysis study on young male adults, Acta Odontol Scand, 24, 1
- 10.1093/ejo/10.1.346 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.031 · DOI
- Vannier MW, 1994, Craniosynostosis: diagnostic imaging with three‐dimensional CT presentation, Am J Neurorad, 15, 1861
- Vannier MW, 1996, Three‐dimensional imaging, surgical planning, and image‐guided surgery, Radiol Clin North Am, 34, 545, 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00491-2 · DOI
- Walker GF, 1967, Summary of research report on the analysis of craniofacial growth, N Zealand Dent J, 63, 31
- 10.1007/BF01427149 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991001)256:2<177::AID-AR8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oral rehabilitation of children with ectodermal dysplasia
Montanari, M., Callea, M., Battelli, F., & Piana, G. (2012) · BMJ Case Reports · doi:10.1136/bcr.01.2012.5652 · Cited by 26
Montanari, M., Grande, F., Lepidi, L., Piana, G., & Catapano, S. (2023) · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · doi:10.1111/cid.13258 · Cited by 12
Zhu, S., Chen, R., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., & Xie, Z. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07230-5 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Krarup, S., Darvann, T. A., Larsen, P., Marsh, J. L., & Kreiborg, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Sisters of Mercy Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kreiborg, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 669-682
- ISSN
- 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7580
- PMC
- PMC1571566
- OpenAlex
- W1900941719
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- mandibular growth, tooth eruption, three-dimensional analysis, Apert syndrome, mandibular canal, tooth germ, craniofacial growth
- MeSH terms
- Acrocephalosyndactylia, Adolescent, Bicuspid, Child, Child, Preschool, Cuspid, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mandible, Molar, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tooth Eruption, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review