Cited by 86Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Radiography and ImagingMorphological variations and asymmetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Three‐dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption

Open access

Abstract

Normal and abnormal jaw growth and tooth eruption are topics of great importance for several dental and medical disciplines. Thus far, clinical studies on these topics have used two‐dimensional (2D) radiographic techniques. The purpose of the present study was to analyse normal mandibular growth and tooth eruption in three dimensions based on computer tomography (CT) scans, extending the principles of mandibular growth analysis proposed by Björk in 1969 from two to three dimensions. As longitudinal CT data from normal children are not available (for ethical reasons), CT data from children with Apert syndrome were employed, because it has been shown that the mandible in Apert syndrome is unaffected by the malformation, and these children often have several craniofacial CT scans performed during childhood for planning of cranial and midface surgery and for follow‐up after surgery. A total of 49 datasets from ten children with Apert syndrome were available for study. The number of datasets from each individual ranged from three to seven. The first CT scan in each of the ten series was carried out before 1 year of age, and the ages for the 49 scans ranged from 1 week to 14.5 years. The mandible and the teeth were segmented and iso‐surfaces generated. Landmarks were placed on the surface of the mandible, along the mandibular canals, the inner contour of the cortical plate at the lower border of the symphysis menti, and on the teeth. Superimposition of the mandibles in the longitudinal series was performed using the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as suggested by Björk. The study supported the findings of stability of the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as seen in profile view previously reported by Björk & Skieller in 1983. However, the mandibular canals were, actually, relocated laterally during growth. Furthermore, the position of tooth buds remained relatively stable inside the jaw until root formation started. Eruption paths of canines and premolars were vertical, whereas molars erupted in a lingual direction. The 3D method would seem to offer new insight into jaw growth and tooth eruption, but further studies are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00479.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rotational growth alters the spatial relationship between the implant and adjacent teeth.

    “The rotational growth alters the spatial relationship between the implant and adjacent teeth [64].”

    From Outcomes of dental implant treatment in 3–18 year old children with ectodermal dysplasia: a systematic review spanning three decades (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Mandibular growth and Discussion passages describe jaw remodelling, canal shifts and tooth eruption, but do not address rotational growth changing the position of an implant relative to adjacent teeth. A search for implant-related passages found only metallic implants used as reference markers in earlier growth studies (Introduction; Fig. 1 caption), not the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1097/00001665-199001030-00001 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00001665-200011030-00002 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/42.896780 · DOI
  4. Björk A, 1951, Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth, Angle Orthod, 21, 3
  5. 10.3109/00016355509028170 · DOI
  6. BjörkA(1966)Käkarnas tillväxt och utveckling i relation till kraniet i dess helhet. InNordisk Klinisk Odontologi I–V I 1(edsHolstJJ ØstbyBN OsvaldO) pp.1–44. Copenhagen: Forlaget for Faglitteratur.
  7. 10.1002/ajpa.1330290217 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0002-9416(68)90179-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/ejo/5.1.1 · DOI
  12. Broadbent BH, 1931, A new x‐ray technique and its application to orthodontia, Angle Orthod, 1, 45
  13. Bro‐Nielsen M, 1996, Computer Assisted Radiology, 921
  14. Bro‐Nielsen M, 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205, 3
  15. Carlsen O, 1987, Dental Morphology
  16. 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600389 · DOI
  17. Cohen MM, 2000, Craniosynostosis. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management, 316
  18. Dahlberg G, 1940, Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students
  19. Dryden IL, 1998, Statistical Shape Analysis
  20. 10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0299:AMFTPI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  21. HilgerKB LarsenP KreiborgS DarvannTA MarshJL(2003)Active shape analysis of mandibular growth. InMedical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2003(edsEllisRE PetersTM) pp.902–909. Berlin: Springer Uerlag. · DOI
  22. Hofrath H, 1931, Die Bedeutung der Röntgenfern‐ und Abstandsaufnahme für die Diagnostik der. Kieferanomalien, Fortschr Orthod, 1, 232
  23. 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6 · DOI
  24. IDL Research Systems, 1997, Interactive Data Language
  25. 10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0117:DDIAS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/00006534-200008000-00001 · DOI
  27. 10.1259/dmfr.1977.0015 · DOI
  28. Kreiborg S, 1985, The application of roentgencephalometry to the study of craniofacial anomalies, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl, 1, 31
  29. Kreiborg S, 1992, The oral manifestations of Apert syndrome, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol, 12, 41
  30. 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80478-0 · DOI
  31. Kreiborg S, 1996, En ny metode til tredimensional analyse af tanddannelse og ‐eruption, Tandlægebladet, 100, 57
  32. Kreiborg S, 1996, Computer Assisted Radiology, 1066
  33. Kreiborg S, 1999, Cephalometric study of the Apert syndrome in adolescence and adulthood, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol, 19, 1
  34. Kreiborg S, 2001, Orthodontics at the Turn of the Century, 181
  35. 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0190:ODIUCS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  36. Marsh JL, 1983, Surface imaging from computerized tomographic scans, Surgery, 94, 159
  37. Marsh JL, 1991, The craniofacial anatomy of Apert syndrome, Clin Plast Surg, 18, 237, 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30820-8 · DOI
  38. Press WH, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing
  39. 10.1016/0002-9416(58)90012-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/BF02174360 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00429-003-0343-4 · DOI
  42. Ricketts RM, 1981, Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics, Angle Orthod, 51, 115
  43. SchleidtDT(2002)Validation of three‐dimensional craniofacial imaging of computed tomography.Thesis.University of Copenhagen.
  44. Solow B, 1966, The pattern of craniofacial association. A morphological and methodological correlation and factor analysis study on young male adults, Acta Odontol Scand, 24, 1
  45. 10.1093/ejo/10.1.346 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.031 · DOI
  47. Vannier MW, 1994, Craniosynostosis: diagnostic imaging with three‐dimensional CT presentation, Am J Neurorad, 15, 1861
  48. Vannier MW, 1996, Three‐dimensional imaging, surgical planning, and image‐guided surgery, Radiol Clin North Am, 34, 545, 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00491-2 · DOI
  49. Walker GF, 1967, Summary of research report on the analysis of craniofacial growth, N Zealand Dent J, 63, 31
  50. 10.1007/BF01427149 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991001)256:2<177::AID-AR8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krarup, S., Darvann, T. A., Larsen, P., Marsh, J. L., & Kreiborg, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Sisters of Mercy Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Kreiborg, S.
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
207
Issue
5
Pages
669-682
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W1900941719
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
mandibular growth, tooth eruption, three-dimensional analysis, Apert syndrome, mandibular canal, tooth germ, craniofacial growth
MeSH terms
Acrocephalosyndactylia, Adolescent, Bicuspid, Child, Child, Preschool, Cuspid, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mandible, Molar, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tooth Eruption, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review