Cited by 33Circadian rhythm and melatoninHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: circadian changes and their seasonal dependence

Open access
Gerics, Balázs, Szalay, Ferenc, Hajós, Ferenc·2006·Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

The pacemaker of the biological clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, was studied in intact male rats to determine its immunoreactivity to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a specific marker of astrocytes. Animals were kept under 12‐h light–dark cycles in synchrony with day–night periods. Immunohistochemical reactions were carried out at midday and late at night in both winter (January) and summer (July). In winter, GFAP immunoreactivity was found to be low during the day and high at night. The findings were reversed in summer, when GFAP immunoreactivity was high during the day and low at night. Increased GFAP immunoreactivity appeared in the form of an abundance of thick immunopositive fibres rather than of cell bodies. This was interpreted as a hypertrophy of pre‐existing astrocytes due to alternating photic stimulation conveyed by retinofugal fibres to the SCN. The observed seasonal reversal in the direction of GFAP oscillations raises the possibility that a circannual timer exists outside the SCN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00593.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GFAP expression is modulated by physiological stimuli such as physical activity, enriched environments, and glucocorticoids, and fluctuates with circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

    “Expression of GFAP is also modulated by physiological stimuli such as physical activity19, exposure to enriched environments19, and glucocorticoids20, and it fluctuates with circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus21.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerics, B., Szalay, F., & Hajós, F.
Affiliations
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
Corresponding author
Hajós, Ferenc
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
209
Issue
2
Pages
231-237
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W2041941650
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
glial fibrillary acidic protein, suprachiasmatic nucleus, astrocytes, circadian rhythm, seasonal variation, biological clock, astrocyte hypertrophy, photic stimulation, hypothalamus
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hypertrophy, Male, Photic Stimulation, Seasons, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review