Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FURTHER DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR USE BY TEACHERS *

Weir, Kirk, Duveen, Gerard·1981·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

SUMMARY: This paper describes the further development of a new rating scale for use by teachers, the Prosocial Behaviour Questionnaire (PBQ). The PBB is designed For use in the investigation of positive aspects of children's behaviour in primary school (ages 5–11 years). Tests of internal and external reliability and of validity are reported. It is concluded that the PBQ is a useful research instrument, However, teachers need training in its use and should be aware of the possible “halo” effects on their ratings of the child's sex. reading ability, aggressiveness and deviant behaviour

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1981.tb00561.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Weir, K., & Duveen, G.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-10
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
357-374
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2053247954
Cited by
213
References
0
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR USE BY TEACHERS *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1981.tb00561.x
The paper
Weir, K., & Duveen, G. (1981). FURTHER DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR USE BY TEACHERS *. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1981.tb00561.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.