Insights into the control of attentional set in ADHD using the attentional blink paradigm
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous work on visual selective attention in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has utilised spatial search paradigms. This study compared ADHD to control children on a temporal search task using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). In addition, the effects of irrelevant singleton distractors on search performance were examined. METHOD: In each condition, subjects reported the identity of a red letter 'probe' in a sequence of white letters which appeared one after the other at a central fixation point. The temporal position of the probe varied from an initial target, which was distinguished by surrounding asterisks. The target was reported in addition to the probe in condition 2, but not in the baseline condition 1. In a third condition, the initial target was not reported, but one of the asterisks appeared as a colour singleton on some trials. RESULTS: All children displayed an 'attentional blink' with probe detection reduced when it appeared at close temporal relations relative to the target. This 'blink' reduced over time, and there were no group differences in the recovery of performance, although ADHD children made more errors overall. The ADHD group were also more vulnerable than controls to distraction from irrelevant singletons in condition 3. CONCLUSION: Although the basic mechanisms of selective attention were not impaired in children with ADHD, these children appeared to require more resources to execute the task and were more vulnerable to distraction by irrelevant singletons, indicating deficits in the maintenance of attentional control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deficits in each of the seven domains have been described for individuals with ADHD.
“Deficits in each of these domains have been described for individuals with ADHD (e.g. Selective Attention [20], Sustained Attention [21], Response Precision [22], Cognitive Flexibility [23], Working Memory [24], Temporal Information Processing [15], Response Inhibition [13]).”
From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reaction time performance in ADHD: improvement under fast-incentive condition and familial effects
ANDREOU, P., NEALE, B. M., CHEN, W., CHRISTIANSEN, H., GABRIELS, I., HEISE, A., MEIDAD, S., MULLER, U. C., UEBEL, H., BANASCHEWSKI, T., et al. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707000815 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention
Mueller, A., Hong, D. S., Shepard, S., & Moore, T. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.009 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Uebel, H., Albrecht, B., Asherson, P., Börger, N. A., Butler, L., Chen, W., Christiansen, H., Heise, A., Kuntsi, J., Schäfer, U., et al. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02139.x · Cited by 161 · see citing works
ADHD and Behavioral Inhibition: A Re-examination of the Stop-signal Task
Alderson, R. M., Rapport, M. D., Sarver, D. E., & Kofler, M. J. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9230-z · Cited by 87 · see citing works
What does distractibility in ADHD reveal about mechanisms for top-down attentional control?
Friedman-Hill, S. R., Wagman, M. R., Gex, S. E., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.013 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Kofler, M. J., Alderson, R. M., Raiker, J. S., Bolden, J., Sarver, D. E., & Rapport, M. D. (2014) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000050 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Cognitive Control and Attentional Selection in Adolescents with ADHD Versus ADD
Carr, L., Henderson, J., & Nigg, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2010.517168 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mason, D. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Kent, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mason, Deanna J.
- ORCID
- Kent, Lindsey
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-23
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1345-1353
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2163901152
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- attentional blink, attentional set, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, visual selective attention, rapid serial visual presentation, temporal search, singleton distractors, attentional control, children, distraction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Serial Learning, Set, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review