Cited by 71Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Obsessive Compulsive Scale of the Child Behavior Checklist predicts obsessive‐compulsive disorder: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis

Open access
Hudziak, James J., Althoff, Robert R., Stanger, Catherine, van Beijsterveldt, C.E.M., Nelson, Elliot C., Hanna, Gregory L., Boomsma, Dorret I., Todd, Richard D.·2006·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine a score on the Obsessive Compulsive Scale (OCS) from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to screen for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) in children and to rigorously test the specificity and sensitivity of a single cutpoint. Methods: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to data from 61 patients with clinically determined OCD, 64 clinical controls and 73 general population controls to determine the best sum score on the CBCL‐OCS to predict confirmed OCD in children. Using the ROC‐determined cutoff, this score was applied to a national sample of CBCL data from 2460 singleton children ages 4–18 and to 20,016 children ages 7–18 from three large general population twin samples to determine the estimated prevalence in the general population. Results: Using a CBCL‐OCS score of 5 demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of .88 with high sensitivity (92%) and moderate specificity (67%) compared to clinical controls. Compared to the general population controls, the AUC was .96 with high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (89%). In the twin samples, the number of participants with CBCL‐OCS scores above this cutpoint was 2.3–7.1%. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the OCS of the CBCL may provide a highly effective way to screen for childhood OCD, and that the prevalence of childhood OCD may have been underestimated, thus prompting the need for further research into screening children for this condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01465.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lifetime and current axis I diagnoses were made independently by two clinicians using all sources of information according to DSM-5 criteria.

    “Lifetime and current axis I diagnoses were made independently by two clinicians using all sources of information according to DSM-5 criteria [31].”

    From Altered Error Monitoring and Decreased Flanker Task Accuracy in Pediatric Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Participants and procedure section says diagnoses were made using DSM-IIIR rules, not DSM-5 criteria. The Limitations section says OCD diagnoses were based on a single skilled clinician assessment, contrary to the claim that two clinicians made them independently. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Berg, C.J., Rapoport, J.L., & Flament, M. (1985). The Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version. Psycho- pharmacology Bulletin, 21, 1057-1059.
  2. Calvocoressi, L., Lewis, B., Harris, M., Trufan, S.J., Goodman, W.K., McDougle, C.J., & Price, L.H. (1995). Family accommodation in obsessive-compulsive dis- order. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 441-443.
  3. Fireman, B., Koran, L.M., Leventhal, J.L., & Jacobson, A. (2001). The prevalence of clinically recognized obses- sive-compulsive disorder in a large health mainten- ance organization. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1904-1910.
  4. Geller, D.A., Coffey, B., Doyle, R., Shaw, B.A., & Biederman, J. (2003). Validation of the Obsessive- Compulsive Scale of the CBCL. Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
  5. Heyman, I., Fombonne, E., Simmons, H., Ford, T., Meltzer, H., & Goodman, R. (2001). Prevalence of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the British nation- wide survey of child mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 324-329.
  6. Hudziak, J.J., Heath, A.C., Madden, P.F., Reich, W., Bucholz, K.K., Slutske, W., Bierut, L.J., Neuman, R.J., & Todd, R.D. (1998). Latent class and factor analysis of DSM-IV ADHD: A twin study of female adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 848-857.
  7. March, J., & Mulle, K. (1998). OCD in children and adolescents: A cognitive behavioral treatment manual. New York: Guilford Press.
  8. March, J.S., Franklin, M., Nelson, A., & Foa, E. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for pediatric ob- sessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 8-18.
  9. McConaughy, S.H., Stanger, C., & Achenbach, T.M. (1992). Three-year course of behavioral/emotional problems in a national sample of 4-to 16-year-olds: I. Agreement among informants. Journal of the Amer- ican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 932-940.
  10. Mower, W.R. (1999). Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports. Annals of Emergency Medi- cine, 33, 85-91.
  11. Pauls, D.L., Alsobrook, J.P., 2nd, Goodman, W., Ras- mussen, S., & Leckman, J.F. (1995). A family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 76-84.
  12. Rapoport, J.L., Inoff-Germain, G., Weissman, M.M., Greenwald, S., Narrow, W.E., Jensen, P.S., Lahey, B.B., & Canino, G. (2000). Childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder in the NIMH MECA study: Parent versus child identification of cases. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14, 535-548.
  13. Rey, J.M., Morris-Yates, A., & Stanislaw, H. (1992). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic rests using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Re- search, 2, 39-50.
  14. Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
  15. Riddle, M. (1998). Obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents. British Journal of Psychi- atry Supplement, 91-96.
  16. Valleni-Basile, L.A., Garrison, C.Z., Jackson, K.L., Waller, J.L., McKeown, R.E., Addy, C.L., & Cuffe, S.P. (1994). Frequency of obsessive-compulsive dis- order in a community sample of young adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 782-791.
  17. Zohar, A.H., Ratzoni, G., Pauls, D.L., Apter, A., Bleich, A., Kron, S., Rappaport, M., Weizman, A., & Cohen, D.J. (1992). An epidemiological study of obsessive-compul- sive disorder and related disorders in Israeli adoles- cents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 1057-1061. Manuscript accepted 13 January 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudziak, J. J., Althoff, R. R., Stanger, C., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Nelson, E. C., Hanna, G. L., Boomsma, D. I., & Todd, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hudziak, James J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-29
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
160-166
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2020324665
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, childhood OCD, Child Behavior Checklist, screening, sensitivity and specificity, prevalence, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Area Under Curve, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review