The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Annotation: Neurofeedback – train your brain to train behaviour
Abstract
Background: Neurofeedback (NF) is a form of behavioural training aimed at developing skills for self‐regulation of brain activity. Within the past decade, several NF studies have been published that tend to overcome the methodological shortcomings of earlier studies. This annotation describes the methodical basis of NF and reviews the evidence base for its clinical efficacy and effectiveness in neuropsychiatric disorders. Methods: In NF training, self‐regulation of specific aspects of electrical brain activity is acquired by means of immediate feedback and positive reinforcement. In frequency training, activity in different EEG frequency bands has to be decreased or increased. Training of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) addresses the regulation of cortical excitability. Results: NF studies revealed paradigm‐specific effects on, e.g., attention and memory processes and performance improvements in real‐life conditions, in healthy subjects as well as in patients. In several studies it was shown that children with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) improved behavioural and cognitive variables after frequency (e.g., theta/beta) training or SCP training. Neurophysiological effects could also be measured. However, specific and unspecific training effects could not be disentangled in these studies. For drug‐resistant patients with epilepsy, significant and long‐lasting decreases of seizure frequency and intensity through SCP training were documented in a series of studies. For other child psychiatric disorders (e.g., tic disorders, anxiety, and autism) only preliminary investigations are available. Conclusions: There is growing evidence for NF as a valuable treatment module in neuropsychiatric disorders. Further, controlled studies are necessary to establish clinical efficacy and effectiveness and to learn more about the mechanisms underlying successful training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment
Barkley, R. A., & Poillion, M. J. (1994) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/019874299401900205 · Cited by 4,639
Electroencephalography—Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields
(1982) · Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System · doi:10.1016/0165-1838(82)90067-4 · Cited by 3,427
Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook
(2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.4.443-a · Cited by 2,341
Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook
Vaughn, B. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-199805000-00039 · Cited by 1,390
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment
SILVER, L. B. (1991) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199107000-00040 · Cited by 1,384
Nunez, P. L., Srinivasan, R., Westdorp, A. F., Wijesinghe, R. S., Tucker, D. M., Silberstein, R. B., & Cadusch, P. J. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00066-7 · Cited by 1,225
Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior.
Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T., Canavan, A. G., & Rockstroh, B. (1990) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1990.70.1.1 · Cited by 1,099
Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony
Le Van Quyen, M., Foucher, J., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Lutz, A., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (2001) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(01)00372-7 · Cited by 887
Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI
deCharms, R. C., Maeda, F., Glover, G. H., Ludlow, D., Pauly, J. M., Soneji, D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Mackey, S. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505210102 · Cited by 876
Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., & Johnstone, S. J. (2003) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00362-0 · Cited by 819
Cited by
Marzbani, H., Marateb, H., & Mansourian, M. (2016) · Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal · doi:10.15412/j.bcn.03070208 · Cited by 484
Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial
Gevensleben, H., Holl, B., Albrecht, B., Vogel, C., Schlamp, D., Kratz, O., Studer, P., Rothenberger, A., Moll, G. H., & Heinrich, H. (2009) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02033.x · Cited by 398
Self-citationSonuga‐Barke, E. J. S., & Halperin, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02195.x · Cited by 320
Training the brain: fact and fad in cognitive and behavioral remediation.
Rabipour, S., & Raz, A. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.006 · Cited by 267
Brain–Computer Interface Technologies in the Coming Decades
Lance, B. J., Kerick, S. E., Ries, A. J., Oie, K. S., & McDowell, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2184830 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinrich, H., Gevensleben, H., & Strehl, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-16
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2153897063
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annotation: Neurofeedback – train your brain to train behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01665.x
- The paper
- Heinrich, H., Gevensleben, H., & Strehl, U. (2007). Annotation: Neurofeedback – train your brain to train behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01665.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.