Cited by 231EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyCognitive Computing and Networks

Brain–Computer Interface Technologies in the Coming Decades

Open access
Lance, B. J., Kerick, S. E., Ries, A. J., Oie, K. S., McDowell, K.·2012·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

As the proliferation of technology dramatically infiltrates all aspects of modern life, in many ways the world is becoming so dynamic and complex that technological capabilities are overwhelming human capabilities to optimally interact with and leverage those technologies. Fortunately, these technological advancements have also driven an explosion of neuroscience research over the past several decades, presenting engineers with a remarkable opportunity to design and develop flexible and adaptive brain-based neurotechnologies that integrate with and capitalize on human capabilities and limitations to improve human-system interactions. Major forerunners of this conception are brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which to this point have been largely focused on improving the quality of life for particular clinical populations and include, for example, applications for advanced communications with paralyzed or “locked in” patients as well as the direct control of prostheses and wheelchairs. Near-term applications are envisioned that are primarily task oriented and are targeted to avoid the most difficult obstacles to development. In the farther term, a holistic approach to BCIs will enable a broad range of task-oriented and opportunistic applications by leveraging pervasive technologies and advanced analytical approaches to sense and merge critical brain, behavioral, task, and environmental information. Communications and other applications that are envisioned to be broadly impacted by BCIs are highlighted; however, these represent just a small sample of the potential of these technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2012.2184830

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [53]B. Rossion, C. Schiltz, and M. Crommelinck, 'The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform,' Neuroimage , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 877-883, 2003.
  2. Biological Sciences , vol. 359, no. 1451, p. 1737, 2004.
  3. Interaction (ACII) and workshops , 2009.
  4. [113]H. Gevensleben, B. Holl, B. Albrecht, C. Vogel, D. Schlamp, O. Kratz, P. Studer, A. A randomised controlled clinical trial,' Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 7, pp. 780-789, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lance, B. J., Kerick, S. E., Ries, A. J., Oie, K. S., & McDowell, K.
Affiliations
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2012-05
Volume
100
Issue
Special Centennial Issue
Pages
1585-1599
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W2008747572
Cited by
231
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
brain-computer interface, human-system interaction, neurotechnology, locked-in patients, communication aids, prosthetic control, wheelchair control, pervasive technologies, brain signal analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review