Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Children at family risk of dyslexia: a follow‐up in early adolescence

Snowling, Margaret J., Muter, Valerie, Carroll, Julia·2007·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: This study is the follow‐up in early adolescence of children born to families with a history of dyslexia (). Methods: Fifty young people with a family history of dyslexia and 20 young people from control families were assessed at 12–13 years on a battery of tests of literacy and language skills, and they completed questionnaires tapping self‐perception and print exposure. One parent from each family participated in an interview documenting family circumstances (including family literacy) and a range of environmental variables considered likely correlates of reading disability. They also rated their child's behavioural and emotional adjustment and their own health and well‐being. Parental literacy levels were also measured. Results: Forty‐two per cent of the ‘at‐risk’ sample had reading and spelling impairments. A significant proportion of the literacy‐impaired group were affected by behavioural and emotional difficulties, although they were not low in terms of global self‐esteem. The children in the at‐risk subgroup who did not fulfil criteria for literacy impairment showed weak orthographic skills in adolescence and their reading was not fluent. There were no differences in the literacy levels or activities of the parents of impaired and unimpaired at‐risk children, and no significant correlation between parent and child reading levels in the at‐risk group. The impaired group read less than the other groups, their reading difficulties impacted learning at school and there was evidence that they also had an impact on family life and maternal well‐being. Conclusions: The literacy difficulties of children at family‐risk of dyslexia were longstanding and there was no evidence of catch‐up in these skills between 8 and 13 years. The findings point to the role of gene–environment correlation in the determination of dyslexia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01725.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Snowling, M. J., Muter, V., & Carroll, J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-21
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
609-618
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2139008680
Cited by
276
References
3
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children at family risk of dyslexia: a follow‐up in early adolescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01725.x
The paper
Snowling, M. J., Muter, V., & Carroll, J. (2007). Children at family risk of dyslexia: a follow‐up in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01725.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.