Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 666

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task‐dependent modulation

Open access
Baker, S. N., Olivier, E., Lemon, R. N.·1997·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Recordings were made of local field potential (slow waves) and pyramidal tract neurone (PTN) discharge from pairs of sites separated by a horizontal distance of up to 1.5 m m in the primary motor cortex of two conscious macaque monkeys performing a precision grip task. In both monkeys, the slow wave recordings showed bursts of oscillations in the 20–30 Hz range. Spectral analysis revealed that the oscillations were coherent between the two simultaneously recorded cortical sites. In the monkey from which most data were recorded, the mean frequency of peak coherence was 23.4 Hz. Coherence in this frequency range was also seen between cortical slow wave recordings and rectified EMG of hand and forearm muscles active during the task, and between pairs of rectified EMGs. The dynamics of the coherence were investigated by analysing short, quasi‐stationary data segments aligned relative to task performance. This revealed that the 20–30 Hz coherent oscillations were present mainly during the hold phase of the precision grip task. The spikes of identified PTNs were used to compile spike‐triggered averages of the slow wave recordings. Oscillations were seen in 11/17 averages of the slow wave recorded on the same electrode as the triggering spike, and 11/17 averages of the slow wave recorded on the distant electrode. The mean period of these oscillations was 45.8 ms. It is concluded that oscillations in the range 20–30 Hz are present in monkey motor cortex, are coherent between spatially separated cortical sites, and encompass the pyramidal tract output neurones. They are discernable in the EMG of active muscles, and show a consistent task‐dependent modulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.225bo.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 666

Metadata

Authors
Baker, S. N., Olivier, E., & Lemon, R. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-05
Volume
501
Issue
1
Pages
225-241
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2172257310
Cited by
666
References
30
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task‐dependent modulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.225bo.x
The paper
Baker, S. N., Olivier, E., & Lemon, R. N. (1997). Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task‐dependent modulation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.225bo.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.