Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased contribution of NR2A subunit to synaptic NMDA receptors in developing rat cortical neurons

Open access
Stocca, Gabriella, Vicini, Stefano·1998·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Pharmacologically isolated miniature NMDA receptor‐mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (mN‐EPSCs) were recorded in large visual cortical neurons in layer V of rat cortical slices. Haloperidol (100 μ m) and CP101,606 (10 μ m), two specific blockers of NMDA receptors comprising NR1/NR2B subunits, were tested on mN‐EPSCs in rats at postnatal days 7 and 8 (P7–P8) and P13–P15. At both ages tested, no significant effects of these drugs were seen in the whole population of neurons, although in few neurons at both ages changes in amplitude were observed with haloperidol. Other dopamine receptor antagonists, spiperone and clozapine, failed to decrease mN‐EPSCs in cortical neurons at P13–P15. CP101,606 (10 μ m) significantly decreased the amplitude of evoked N‐EPSCs (eN‐EPSCs) in visual cortical slices from rats at P3–P5, a developmental stage at which mRNA studies have indicated the virtual absence of NR2A mRNA. CP101,606 failed to significantly change evoked AMPA‐mediated EPSCs at P5 and eN‐EPSCs at P7–P8 and P13–P15. NMDA receptor‐mediated currents were also studied in somatic outside‐out patches at P13–P15 with fast application of l‐glutamate (1 m m). Haloperidol (50 μ m) and CP101,606 (10 μ m) blocked these currents in all patches tested. The effect of CP101,606 was concentration dependent. We suggest that rather early in development synaptic receptors comprising NR1/NR2B subunits could be associated with other subunits so that blockade by haloperidol and CP101,606 is prevented. Moreover, the consistent blockade seen in outside out patches might be ascribed to the confinement of NR1/NR2B receptors to an extrasynaptic population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.013bu.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Stocca, G., & Vicini, S.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-02
Volume
507
Issue
1
Pages
13-24
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2065848862
Cited by
363
References
3
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased contribution of NR2A subunit to synaptic NMDA receptors in developing rat cortical neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.013bu.x
The paper
Stocca, G., & Vicini, S. (1998). Increased contribution of NR2A subunit to synaptic NMDA receptors in developing rat cortical neurons. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.013bu.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.