Cited by 90Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience of respiration and sleepCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

The arterial baroreceptor reflex of the rat exhibits positive feedback properties at the frequency of mayer waves.

Open access
Bertram, Delphine, Barrès, Christian, Cuisinaud, Guy, Julien, Claude·1998·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Modelling studies have led to the proposal that Mayer waves (∼0.4 Hz in rats) could result from a resonance phenomenon in a feedback control loop. In this study, we investigated the presence of a resonance frequency in the arterial baroreceptor reflex loop, i.e. a particular frequency at which arterial pressure feeds back positively to the baroreceptors. Frequency responses of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to aortic depressor nerve (ADN) stimulation were studied in fifteen urethane anaesthetized, ventilated rats with cardiac autonomic blockade. The ADN was stimulated using rectangular trains of impulses (2 ms, 100 Hz) delivered at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 1 Hz. Phase angles between impulses and MAP were calculated using cross‐spectral analysis based on a fast Fourier transform algorithm. Rhythmic ADN stimulation induced regular MAP oscillations at the expected frequencies that were attenuated by α‐adrenoceptor blockade and abolished after ganglionic blockade. The relationship between impulse and MAP oscillations was characterized by a strong coherence and a positive phase shift at low frequencies, indicating that impulses led MAP with respect to the out‐of‐phase pattern. Deviation of the phase from the out‐of‐phase behaviour was mainly due to the presence of a fixed time delay (∼0.8 s) between ADN stimuli and MAP changes. Phase angles fell to zero at 0.42 ± 0.02 Hz. In rats, the arterial baroreceptor reflex exhibits a resonance frequency close to the frequency of spontaneously occurring Mayer waves. The reflex therefore seems the most likely origin for the Mayer waves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.251by.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertram, D., Barrès, C., Cuisinaud, G., & Julien, C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-11
Volume
513
Issue
1
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1978076046
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
Mayer waves, resonant frequency, positive feedback, phase shift, alpha-adrenergic blockade, ganglionic blockade, cross-spectral coherence, time delay
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists, Algorithms, Animals, Arteries, Blood Pressure, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Feedback, Ganglionic Blockers, Male, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Baroreflex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review