Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association of somatic action potential shape with sensory receptive properties in guinea‐pig dorsal root ganglion neurones

Open access
Djouhri, L., Bleazard, L., Lawson, S. N.·1998·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Intracellular voltage recordings were made from the somata of L6 and S1 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones at 28.5–31 °C in young guinea‐pigs (150–300 g) anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone. Action potentials (APs) evoked by dorsal root stimulation were used to classify conduction velocities (CVs) as C, Aδ or Aα/β. Units with overshooting APs and membrane potentials (Vm) more negative than −40 mV were analysed: 40 C‐, 45 Aδ‐ and 94 Aα/β‐fibre units. Sensory receptive properties were characterized as: (a) low‐threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM) units (5 C‐, 10 Aδ‐ and 57 Aα/β‐fibre units); (b) nociceptive units, responding to noxious mechanical stimuli, some also to noxious heat (40 C‐, 27 Aδ‐ and 27 Aα/β‐fibre units); (c) unresponsive units that failed to respond to a variety of tests; and (d) C‐fibre cooling‐sensitive units (n= 4). LTM units made up about 8 % of identified C‐fibre units, 36 % of identified Aδ‐fibre units and > 73 % of identified Aα/β‐fibre units. Compared with LTM units, the nociceptive units had APs that were longer on average by 3 times (C‐fibre units), 1.7 times (Aδ‐fibre units) and 1.4 times (Aα/β‐fibre units). They also had significantly longer rise times (RTs) and fall times (FTs) in all CV ranges. Between Aα/β‐nociceptors and Aα/β‐LTMs there was a proportionately greater difference in RT than in FT. The duration of the afterhyperpolarization measured to 80 % recovery (AHP 80) was also significantly longer in nociceptive than LTM neurones in all CV ranges: by 3 times (C‐fibre units), 6.3 times (Aδ‐fibre units) and 3.6 times (Aα/β‐fibre units). The mean values of these variables in unresponsive units were similar to those of nociceptive units in each CV range; in C‐ and Aδ‐fibre groups their mean AHP duration was even longer than in nociceptive units. A‐fibre LTM neurones were divided into Aδ‐ (D hair units, n= 8), and Aα/β‐ (G hair/field units, n= 22; T (tylotrich) hair units, n= 6; rapidly adapting (RA) glabrous units, n= 6; slowly adapting (SA) hairy and glabrous units, n= 2; and muscle spindle (MS) units n= 17). MS and SA units had the shortest duration APs, FTs and AHP 80 s of all these groups. The mean RT in D hair units was significantly longer than in all Aα/β LTM units combined. T hair units had the longest mean FT and AHP of all the A‐LTM groups. The mean AHP was about 10 times longer in T hair units than in all other A‐LTM units combined (significant), and was similar to that of A‐fibre nociceptive neurones. These differences in somatic AP shape may aid in distinguishing between LTM and nociceptive or unresponsive C‐ and Aδ‐fibre units but probably not between nociceptive and unresponsive units. The differences seen may reflect differences in expression or activation of different types of ion channel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.857ba.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Djouhri, L., Bleazard, L., & Lawson, S. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-12
Volume
513
Issue
3
Pages
857-872
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2156881907
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of somatic action potential shape with sensory receptive properties in guinea‐pig dorsal root ganglion neurones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.857ba.x
The paper
Djouhri, L., Bleazard, L., & Lawson, S. N. (1998). Association of somatic action potential shape with sensory receptive properties in guinea‐pig dorsal root ganglion neurones. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.857ba.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.