The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation
Open accessAbstract
1. Knowledge of the size and orientation of the hand is essential if it is to be moved accurately in space. We used two psychophysical methods to determine whether the perceived size of a body part changes when its sensory input is changed: first, the selection of scaled drawings which matched the apparent size of a body part, and second, a motor task in which the subject drew the body part to depict its perceived size. 2. Complete anaesthesia of the thumb (with a digital nerve block) significantly increased its perceived size by 60-70% when assessed with both psychophysical methods. During this anaesthesia, the perceived size of the adjacent index finger or digits on the contralateral side was unaltered. However, the size of the unanaesthetized lips increased (by approximately 50%). 3. Marked sensory loss for the lips (produced by topical anaesthetics) significantly increased their perceived size when assessed with both methods of measurement. There was a small increase in apparent size of the thumb. 4. To determine whether changes in perceived size could also be produced by an elevation of peripheral inputs, innocuous electrical stimulation of the digital nerves and also painful cooling of the digit were used. Both procedures produced small but significant increases in perceived size of the stimulated part. 5. The results highlight lability in the perceived size of parts of the body and how this affects motor output. The data may reveal perceptual consequences of acute changes in central somatosensory maps, changes which are known to occur with deafferentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proske, U., & Gandevia, S. C. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 · Cited by 2,223
Self-citationGraded motor imagery for pathologic pain: A randomized controlled trial
Moseley, G. L. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32 · Cited by 608
Moseley, G. L., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013 · Cited by 448
Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes
Jull, G., Falla, D., Treleaven, J., Hodges, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20220 · Cited by 310
Serino, A., & Haggard, P. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.004 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandevia, S. C., & Phegan, C. M. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 514
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 609-616
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2032752191
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.609ae.x
- The paper
- Gandevia, S. C., & Phegan, C. M. L. (1999). Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.609ae.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.