The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults
Open accessAbstract
1. We studied quiet stance investigating strategies for maintaining balance. Normal subjects stood with natural stance and with feet together, with eyes open or closed. Kinematic, kinetic and EMG data were evaluated and cross-correlated. 2. Cross-correlation analysis revealed a high, positive, zero-phased correlation between anteroposterior motions of the centre of gravity (COG) and centre of pressure (COP), head and COG, and between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in both sagittal and frontal planes. There was a moderate, negative, zero-phased correlation between the anteroposterior motion of COP and ankle angular motion. 3. Narrow stance width increased ankle angular motion, hip angular motion, mediolateral sway of the COG, and the correlation between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the frontal plane. Correlations between COG and COP and linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the sagittal plane were decreased. The correlation between the hip angular sway in the sagittal and frontal planes was dependent on interaction between support and vision. 4. Low, significant positive correlations with time lags of the maximum of cross-correlation of 250-300 ms were found between the EMG activity of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle and anteroposterior motions of the COG and COP during normal stance. Narrow stance width decreased both correlations whereas absence of vision increased the correlation with COP. 5. Ankle mechanisms dominate during normal stance especially in the sagittal plane. Narrow stance width decreased the role of the ankle and increased the role of hip mechanisms in the sagittal plane, while in the frontal plane both increased. 6. The modulation pattern of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle suggests a central program of control of the ankle joint stiffness working to predict the loading pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ivanenko, Y., & Gurfinkel, V. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00171 · Cited by 482
Ruhe, A., Fejer, R., & Walker, B. (2011) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1543-2 · Cited by 382
Loram, I. D., & Lakie, M. (2002) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2002.01111.x · Cited by 344
Composable controllers for physics-based character animation
Faloutsos, P., van de Panne, M., & Terzopoulos, D. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383287 · Cited by 331
Reliability of Biodex Balance System Measures
Cachupe, W. J. C., Shifflett, B., Kahanov, L., & Wughalter, E. H. (2001) · Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science · doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee0502_3 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Gatev, P., Thomas, S., Kepple, T., & Hallett, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 514
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 915-928
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1978800586
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.915ad.x
- The paper
- Gatev, P., Thomas, S., Kepple, T., & Hallett, M. (1999). Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.915ad.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.