Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suppression of EMG activity by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects during walking

Open access
Petersen, Nicolas T., Butler, Jane E., Marchand‐Pauvert, Veronique, Fisher, Rebecca, Ledebt, Annick, Pyndt, Henrik S., Hansen, Naja L., Nielsen, Jens B.·2001·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The involvement of the motor cortex during human walking was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex at a variety of intensities. Recordings of EMG activity in tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus muscles during walking were rectified and averaged. 2. TMS of low intensity (below threshold for a motor-evoked potential, MEP) produced a suppression of ongoing EMG activity during walking. The average latency for this suppression was 40.0 +/- 1.0 ms. At slightly higher intensities of stimulation there was a facilitation of the EMG activity with an average latency of 29.5 +/- 1.0 ms. As the intensity of the stimulation was increased the facilitation increased in size and eventually a MEP was clear in individual sweeps. 3. In three subjects TMS was replaced by electrical stimulation over the motor cortex. Just below MEP threshold there was a clear facilitation at short latency (approximately 28 ms). As the intensity of the electrical stimulation was reduced the size of the facilitation decreased until it eventually disappeared. We did not observe a suppression of the EMG activity similar to that produced by TMS in any of the subjects. 4. The present study demonstrates that motoneuronal activity during walking can be suppressed by activation of intracortical inhibitory circuits. This illustrates for the first time that activity in the motor cortex is directly involved in the control of the muscles during human walking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00651.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, N. T., Butler, J. E., Marchand‐Pauvert, V., Fisher, R., Ledebt, A., Pyndt, H. S., Hansen, N. L., & Nielsen, J. B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
537
Issue
2
Pages
651-656
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2087156207
Cited by
255
References
15
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of EMG activity by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects during walking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00651.x
The paper
Petersen, N. T., Butler, J. E., Marchand‐Pauvert, V., Fisher, R., Ledebt, A., Pyndt, H. S., Hansen, N. L., & Nielsen, J. B. (2001). Suppression of EMG activity by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects during walking. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00651.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.