Aspects of skin physiology in the Pigmy hippopotamus Choeropsis liberiensis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This range is comparable to previously published rates for the common hippopotamus at the same temperatures, indicative of similar dermal physiology for the two species.
“This range is comparable to previously published rates for the common hippopotamus at the same temperatures, indicative of similar dermal physiology for the two species (Olivier 1975).”
From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Olivier 1975
Skin secretions from a female C. liberiensis had a pH of 9.5 and lower mean sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) concentrations than secretions from the common hippopotamus, possibly reflecting dietary or metabolic differences.
“Skin secretions from a female C. liberiensis had a pH of 9.5 and lower mean sodium (Na + ) and potassium (K + ) concentrations than secretions from the common hippopotamus, possibly reflecting dietary or metabolic differences (Olivier 1975).”
From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Olivier 1975
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae)
Flacke, G. L., & Decher, J. (2019) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sez017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- OLIVIER, R. C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- OLIVIER, R. C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-06
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-213
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2032765260
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- skin physiology, Choeropsis liberiensis, hippopotamus, skin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
