The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, phylogeny and ecology
Abstract
Variation in resting metabolic rate is strongly correlated with differences in body weight among birds. The lowest taxonomic level at which most of the variance in resting metabolic rate and body weight is evident for the sample is among families within orders. The allometric exponent across family points is 0.67. This exponent accords with the surface area interpretation of metabolic scaling based on considerations of heat loss. Deviations of family points from this allometric line are used to examine how resting metabolic rates differ among taxa, and whether variation in resting metabolic rate is correlated with broad differences in ecology and behaviour. Despite the strong correlation between resting metabolic rate and body weight, there is evidence for adaptive departures from the allometric line, and possible selective forces are discussed. The allometric scaling of active metabolic rate is compared with that of resting metabolic rate. The allometric exponents for the two levels of energy expenditure differ, demonstrating that active small‐bodied birds require proportionately more energy per unit time above resting levels than do active large‐bodied birds. No consistent evidence was found to indicate that the different methods used to estimate active metabolic rate result in systematic bias. Birds require more energy relative to body size when undertaking breeding activities than at other stages of the annual cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Kleiber, M. (1932) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315 · Cited by 2,222
A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds
Lasiewski, R. C., & Dawson, W. R. (1967) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366368 · Cited by 816
Cited by
A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.122 · Cited by 5,016
Glazier, D. S. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006834 · Cited by 1,069
Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass 2/3
White, C. R., & Seymour, R. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0436428100 · Cited by 720
The ecological costs of avian fat storage
Witter, M. S., & Cuthill, I. C. (1993) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0050 · Cited by 699
Re-Examination of the “3/4-Law” of Metabolism
DODDS, P. S., ROTHMAN, D. H., & WEITZ, J. S. (2001) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2238 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, P. M., & Harvey, P. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-10
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-344
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2112609758
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, phylogeny and ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb03708.x
- The paper
- Bennett, P. M., & Harvey, P. H. (1987). Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, phylogeny and ecology. Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb03708.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.