Cited by 41Marine animal studies overviewGastrointestinal motility and disordersRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Rate of passage of digesta through the alimentary tract of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) (Carnivora: Phocidae)

Krockenberger, M. B., Bryden, M. M.·1994·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

The inert markers chromium‐EDTA (liquid phase marker) and ytterbium nitrate (solid phase marker) were added to the food of three southern elephant seals in Taronga Zoo, Sydney, in a series of nine trials. The enclosures were checked at 15 to 30 minute intervals for up to 60 hours after dosing, and all faeces voided on land were collected (91 samples). Marker concentrations in faecal dry matter were determined and mean retention times calculated from the concentration‐time curves. The faeces were soft to semiliquid, with mean water content of 58% (range 24–80%). The marker concentration curves indicated a rapid rate of food transit through the gastro‐intestinal tract in elephant seals compared with other carnivores. The mean time between dosing and first recovery of marker (Initial Recovery Time) was nine hours. This was significantly longer than the figure of 4.8 hours for northern elephant seals reported previously, and possible reasons for the differences are discussed. Mean Retention Time, a better index of rate of passage of ingesta, was 13 hours for the three southern elephant seals. This compares with times of 22 hours for the dog, 15 hours for the raccoon, and 13 hours for the cat, all carnivores with much shorter gastrointestinal tracts, both absolutely and relative to body size, than the southern elephant seal. It is suggested that the very long small intestine may be an adaptation to foraging at depth, combined with long periods of submergence and the need to ingest…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb06071.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Special adaptations to a marine lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.

    “Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
  • The additional small intestine capacity in marine mammals is required to compensate for a lack of intestinal function during diving.

    “This additional capacity is required to compensate for a lack of intestinal function during diving [23-25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krockenberger, M. B., & Bryden, M. M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bryden, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
234
Issue
2
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2082235448
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
Mirounga leonina, fecal biomarkers, chromium-EDTA, small intestine length, submergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review