Cited by 147Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Leopard prey choice in the Congo Basin rainforest suggests exploitative competition with human bushmeat hunters

Henschel, P., Hunter, L. T. B., Coad, L., Abernethy, K. A., Mühlenberg, M.·2011·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Analyses of leopard Panthera pardus prey choice reveal a strong preference for species weighing 10–40 kg. In the Congo Basin rainforests, species within this weight range are also targeted by bushmeat hunters, potentially leading to exploitative competition between leopards and hunters. We investigated leopard prey choice along a gradient of human disturbance, hypothesizing that leopards will exploit smaller prey where competition is strong, possibly resulting in reduced leopard densities at highly hunted sites. We determined leopard diet by means of scat analysis at four rainforest sites in central Gabon, which varied according to their distance from human settlements. Camera trap data collected at each of the four study sites revealed that human hunting intensity increased with proximity to settlements, while the abundance of potential leopard prey species decreased. We found no evidence of leopards at the site nearest to settlements. At the remaining sites, the number of scats collected, mean leopard prey weight and the proportion of large prey (>20 kg) in leopard diet increased with distance from settlements. Camera trap data demonstrated that leopard population density increased with distance from settlements, from 2.7 ± 0.94 leopards/100 km2 to 12.1 ± 5.11 leopards/100 km2. Our results document an increasing use of smaller prey species and a decrease in leopard density in proximity to settlements, supporting our hypothesis. Comparison of leopard diet with hunter return…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00826.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extirpation of species can lead to the decline of their predators.

    “The extirpation of species can lead to the decline of their predators (Henschel et al., ), and with .% of tree species in the Afrotropics relying on animal dispersal (Beaune et al., ) ecological processes such as plant regeneration can be disrupted (Fa & Brown, ), with far-reaching consequences for plant diversity, composition and forest structure.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henschel, P., Hunter, L. T. B., Coad, L., Abernethy, K. A., & Mühlenberg, M.
Affiliations
  • Panthera Corporation (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Henschel, P.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
285
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W1943229390
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
leopard, prey selection, bushmeat hunting, exploitative competition, human disturbance, scat analysis, diet overlap, rainforest conservation, Congo Basin, hunting intensity, protected areas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review