The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Barley plants were grown for 21 days in sand culture, continuously irrigated with nutrient solution. The rooting depth was divided into three compartments, one above another, such that different zones of the root system could be supplied with very low or high concentrations of a single inorganic nutrient, all other nutrients being maintained at a high concentration. Exposure of parts of the main seminal roots (axes) to high concentrations of phosphate caused a localized promotion of the initiation and subsequent extension of both first and second order laterals, compared with zones receiving very low concentrations of phosphate. This resulted in considerable modification to root form, but with only a small depression in shoot growth, compared with control plants receiving an ample supply to all parts of the root system. The extension of seminal axes was little affected by the concentration of phosphate to which they were exposed. Similar responses to those described for phosphate occurred with variation in concentration of nitrate or ammonium, but with potassium a localized supply promoted the growth of laterals to approximately the same extent as controls throughout the entire root system. The experiments show that adequate external concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus are required by any part of the root system for optimal growth of laterals, but not axes. Possible mechanisms which compensate shoot growth when nutrients are supplied to only part of the root system, and agronomic implications, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Dilution Effect in Plant Nutrition Studies
Jarrell, W. M., & Beverly, R. B. (1981) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60887-1 · Cited by 854
Dissecting Arabidopsis lateral root development
Casimiro, I., Beeckman, T., Graham, N., Bhalerao, R., Zhang, H., Casero, P., Sandberg, G., & Bennett, M. J. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00051-7 · Cited by 683
The nutritional control of root development
Forde, B., & Lorenzo, H. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1010329902165 · Cited by 474
Genomic Analysis of the Nitrate Response Using a Nitrate Reductase-Null Mutant of Arabidopsis
Wang, R., Tischner, R., Gutiérrez, R. A., Hoffman, M., Xing, X., Chen, M., Coruzzi, G., & Crawford, N. M. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.044610 · Cited by 448
Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono
Razaq, M., Zhang, P., Shen, H.-L., & Salahuddin (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171321 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- DREW, M. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-490
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2111727822
- Cited by
- 929
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1975.tb01409.x
- The paper
- DREW, M. C. (1975). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1975.tb01409.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.