Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VARIATION IN GENOMIC FORM IN PLANTS AND ITS ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

BENNETT, MICHAEL D.·1987·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The gross form of the nuclear genome varies greatly among plant species in both anatomy and genetic organization. Chromosome number (ft) ranges from 2 to over 600, and ploidy from 1 to over 20. The amount of DNA in the unreplicated haplophase genome (the 1C value) differs by more than 2500‐fold among angiosperms. Although it has been questioned since the 1930s whether such variation is of adaptive significance and whether it is related, perhaps causally, with environmental factors, no direct or causal links have yet been found. However, variation in DNA C‐value has far‐reaching biological consequences and can be of considerable adaptive and hence ecological significance. Strikingly precise interspecific relationships exist between DNA C‐value and many diverse phenotypic characters at the cellular level, and DNA can affect the phenotype in two ways, firstly by expression of its genie content and, secondly, by the biophysical effects of its mass and volume, the latter defined as nucleotypic effects. Nucleotypic variation in DNA C‐value sets absolute limits to both the minimum size and mass of the basic unit of plant anatomy (i.e. the cell) and the minumum time needed to produce a similar cell with newly synthesized organic molecules. Moreover, in complex multicellular vascular plants, such effects at successive cell cycles are additive, so that DNA C‐value influences many characters, including growth rate, seed weight, minimum generation time and type of life‐cycle. Thus, the nucleotype profoundly affects where, when and how plants grow. Selection for a particular genomic form acting on its spatial or temporal consequences may occur at various levels ranging from the cell to the whole organism and may operate throughout the life‐cycle or at just one stage. DNA C‐value is often indirectly related to environmental factors which determine time‐limited environments via selection acting on the temporal phenotypic consequences of nucleotypic variation. However, in the case of radio‐sensitivity, selection for a low DNA C‐value may act directly on the nucleotype itself, as the size of the nuclear DNA target directly affects the ability of the plant to survive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
BENNETT, M. D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-05
Volume
106
Issue
s1
Pages
177-200
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2012393730
Cited by
411
References
42
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VARIATION IN GENOMIC FORM IN PLANTS AND ITS ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x
The paper
BENNETT, M. D. (1987). VARIATION IN GENOMIC FORM IN PLANTS AND ITS ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.