The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Biological invasions are a major ecological and socio-economic problem in many parts of the world. Despite an explosion of research in recent decades, much remains to be understood about why some species become invasive whereas others do not. Recently, polyploidy (whole genome duplication) has been proposed as an important determinant of invasiveness in plants. Genome duplication has played a major role in plant evolution and can drastically alter a plant's genetic make-up, morphology, physiology and ecology within only one or a few generations. This may allow some polyploids to succeed in strongly fluctuating environments and/or effectively colonize new habitats and, thus, increase their potential to be invasive. SCOPE: We synthesize current knowledge on the importance of polyploidy for the invasion (i.e. spread) of introduced plants. We first aim to elucidate general mechanisms that are involved in the success of polyploid plants and translate this to that of plant invaders. Secondly, we provide an overview of ploidal levels in selected invasive alien plants and explain how ploidy might have contributed to their success. CONCLUSIONS: Polyploidy can be an important factor in species invasion success through a combination of (1) 'pre-adaptation', whereby polyploid lineages are predisposed to conditions in the new range and, therefore, have higher survival rates and fitness in the earliest establishment phase; and (2) the possibility for subsequent adaptation due to a larger genetic diversity that may assist the 'evolution of invasiveness'. Alternatively, polyploidization may play an important role by (3) restoring sexual reproduction following hybridization or, conversely, (4) asexual reproduction in the absence of suitable mates. We, therefore, encourage invasion biologists to incorporate assessments of ploidy in their studies of invasive alien species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x · Cited by 4,854
Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x · Cited by 4,058
Self-citationApg (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 3,627
Chromosomal evolution in higher plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,074
Vilà, M., Espinar, J. L., Hejda, M., Hulme, P. E., Jarošík, V., Maron, J. L., Pergl, J., Schaffner, U., Sun, Y., & Pyšek, P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x · Cited by 3,068
Self-citationVariation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
A proposed unified framework for biological invasions
Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 · Cited by 2,621
Self-citationThe Significance of Responses of the Genome to Challenge
McClintock, B. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.15739260 · Cited by 2,617
Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for Conservation
Hobbs, R. J., & Huenneke, L. F. (1992) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x · Cited by 2,402
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
Cited by
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times
Van de Peer, Y., Ashman, T.-L., Soltis, P. S., & Soltis, D. E. (2021) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koaa015 · Cited by 732
Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species
Forsman, A. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.92 · Cited by 481
What we still don't know about invasion genetics
Bock, D. G., Caseys, C., Cousens, R. D., Hahn, M. A., Heredia, S. M., Hübner, S., Turner, K. G., Whitney, K. D., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13032 · Cited by 441
Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants
Cheng, F., Wu, J., Cai, X., Liang, J., Freeling, M., & Wang, X. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- te Beest, M., Le Roux, J. J., Richardson, D. M., Brysting, A. K., Suda, J., Kubesova, M., & Pysek, P.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-31
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-45
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2061325948
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 213
- FWCI
- 42.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcr277
- The paper
- te Beest, M., Le Roux, J. J., Richardson, D. M., Brysting, A. K., Suda, J., Kubesova, M., & Pysek, P. (2012). The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.