The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genetics of metal tolerance in vascular plants
Abstract
SUMMARY: In many parts of the world soils are detrimental to plant growth owing to elevated levels of metal ions, caused either by natural processes or by the result of man's activities. Many plants have evolved ecotypes or varieties that are able to grow more‐or‐less normally on these soils. This paper reviews our knowledge of the genetics of this phenomenon. The nature of tolerance and the problems of its measurement are discussed. Tolerance is frequently measured by an index produced by comparing growth in a contaminated environment with growth in a control environment. It is argued that this measurement is inappropriate for many genetical studies, and that it is frequently more useful to use growth at a single critical level of metal as a measure of tolerance. Polygenic inheritance provides a null hypothesis that has to be tested in a genetical analysis. Examples of major genes for tolerance to aluminium, arsenic, boron, cadmium, copper and manganese are discussed. Even where major genes have been demonstrated, it is probable that other minor genes, ‘modifiers’, are present as well. Because of the nature of tolerance as a character, dominance and epistasis are likely to vary with the level of metal at which an analysis is performed. Tolerance is generally found to be dominant at some levels of the metal. Studies which have mapped tolerance genes, particularly to aluminium and salt, are discussed. The specificity of tolerance is a matter of some confusion. Some studies indicate that tolerances evolve independently to different metals, but others have suggested that tolerance to one metal may often confer a degree of tolerance to some other metals. Very little is known about the molecular genetics of tolerance, and the mechanisms of tolerance to most metals. The possible role of phytochelatins and metallothionein‐like proteins in metal tolerance is discussed. The distribution of tolerance in natural populations suggests that tolerance is a disadvantage in uncontaminated environments, but how this ‘cost’ arises is not known. There is some evidence that the disadvantage to tolerance may be associated more with the modifiers of tolerance than with the primary tolerance gene. The study of the genetics of tolerance is of importance in planning breeding programmes to produce tolerant crops for use in areas where metal contamination is a limiting factor in productivity. It can also assist in understanding the mechanisms of tolerance, as exemplified by the study of the mechanism of arsenic tolerance in Holcus lanatus. Important areas for further research are discussed. Contents Summary 541 I. Introduction 542 II. Introduction 542 III. Transmission genetics of tolerance 544 IV. Specificity of tolerance 550 V. Molecular genetics of tolerance 552 VI. Ecological genetics of tolerance 553 VII. Conclusions 555 Acknowledgements 556 References 556
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
G., J.-M., & Falconer, D. S. (1962) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1525780 · Cited by 3,705
GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION, SPECIATION, AND CLINES
Hedrick, P. W. (1978) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04617.x · Cited by 2,395
The physiology of metal toxicity in plants
Foy, C. D., Chaney, R. L., & White, M. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455 · Cited by 2,170
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Lawton, J. H., & Johnston, R. F. (1974) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3390 · Cited by 1,961
Hamer, D. H. (1986) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.004405 · Cited by 1,800
Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants: Evolutionary Aspects
Shaw, A. J. (1989) · Cited by 1,152
Heavy metal tolerance of plants
Bothe, H. (2014) · Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Zoologia · Cited by 1,008
Grill, E., Löffler, S., Winnacker, E.-L., & Zenk, M. H. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.18.6838 · Cited by 920
Grill, E., Winnacker, E.-L., & Zenk, M. H. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.2.439 · Cited by 806
Cited by
Broadley, M. R., White, P. J., Hammond, J. P., Zelko, I., & Lux, A. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01996.x · Cited by 2,087
Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis
Clemens, S. (2001) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250000458 · Cited by 1,417
Metal hyperaccumulation in plants
Krämer, U. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112156 · Cited by 1,284
Role of plants, mycorrhizae and phytochelators in heavy metal contaminated land remediation
Khan, A. G., Kuek, C., Chaudhry, T. M., Khoo, C. S., & Hayes, W. J. (2000) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00412-9 · Cited by 870
Approaches for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals
Bhargava, A., Carmona, F. F., Bhargava, M., & Srivastava, S. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.002 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- MACNAIR, M. R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-559
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1988801269
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genetics of metal tolerance in vascular plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03846.x
- The paper
- MACNAIR, M. R. (1993). The genetics of metal tolerance in vascular plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03846.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.