Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion of CO2and other gases inside leaves

PARKHURST, DAVID F.·1994·New Phytologist

Abstract

SUMMARY: Diffusion of CO 2 in the intercellular airspaces of the leaf mesophyll is one of the many processes that can limit photosynthetic carbon assimilation there. This limitation has been largely neglected in recent years, but both theoretical and empirical evidence is presented showing that it can be substantial, reducing CO 2 assimilation rates by 25% or more in some leaves. Intercellular diffusion is fundamentally a three‐dimensional process, because CO 2 enters the leaf through discrete stomata, and not through a uniformly porous epidermis. Modelling it in one dimension can cause major underestimation of its limiting effects. Resistance and conductance models often fail to account well for the limitation, in part because they are usually one‐dimensional representations, but also because they treat continuously interacting processes as if they were sequential. A three‐dimensional diffusion model is used to estimate the intercellular limitation in leaves of different structural types. Intercellular gaseous diffusion probably limits CO 2 assimilation by at most a few percent in many of the agricultural plants commonly studied by laboratory physiologists, as they usually have thin, amphistaomatous leaves. However, it may cause substantial limitations in the thicker, often hypostomatous leaves of the wild plants that occupy large areas of the earth. Several physiological implications of intercellular diffusion are discussed. I close by reiterating published suggestions that the gas‐exchange parameter commonly termed p i should be renamed p es(es for evaporating surfaces) to avoid the confusing implication that p 1, is‘the’intercellular CO 2 pressure. ContentsSummary449I.Introduction450II.Theory of intercellular gaseous diffusion451III.Evidence regarding intercellular gaseous diffusion hmitations461IV.Discussion of assumptions made in §11.1470V.Physiological implications of intercellular gaseous diffusion471VI.Conclusions475Acknowledgements476Appendix, Example showing breakdown of resistance analogy for diffusion with distributed uptake476References477

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
PARKHURST, D. F.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-03
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
449-479
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1981533496
Cited by
352
References
51
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion of CO2and other gases inside leaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x
The paper
PARKHURST, D. F. (1994). Diffusion of CO2and other gases inside leaves. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.