The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in Phaseolus vulgaris
Open accessAbstract
summary: Root architectural plasticity might be an important factor in the acquisition by plants of immobile nutrients such as phosphorus (P). In this study, we examined the effect of P availability on the orientation of basal roots with respect to gravity, and thereby on the growth angle of these roots of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In one set of studies the growth angle of basal roots of bean seedlings was measured over time. Sixteen bean genotypes were examined; six showed a decrease in root orientation with respect to gravity m low P media, one increased orientation, and nine showed no difference within 5 d of basal root emergenece. Bean taproots also showed decreased root orientation with respect to gravity in law P. Growth angle after 5 d was correlated with field performance of contrasting genotypes to low P tropical soils. Mineral deficiencies other than P did not cause changes in root angle. In a. split pouch system that provided high or low P solution to different parts of the root system, the decrease in root angle in low P was found to be a response to globat P availability, and not local to the portion of the root system in low P, Effects of P availability on root angle were associated with reduced shoot P concentration, but preceded effects on plant biomass accumulation and leaf area expansion. Results from growth pouches for genotype G 19833 were confirmed using a solid‐phase buffered sand‐culture system supplying P at three levels. Pea (Pisum sativum), soybean (Glycine max Williams), chickpea Cicer arietinum), lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), and lentil (Lens culinaris) were grown with and without P; soybean and pea also showed decreased basal rout angles m low P.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Test of an Ascorbic Acid Method for Determining Phosphorus in Water and NaHCO 3 Extracts from Soil
Watanabe, F. S., & Olsen, S. R. (1965) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x · Cited by 2,485
Cited by
Phosphorus Dynamics: From Soil to Plant
Shen, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, J., Li, H., Bai, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175232 · Cited by 1,858
Roots of the Second Green Revolution
Lynch, J. P. (2007) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt06118 · Cited by 1,282
Self-citationIntrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture
MALAMY, J. E. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01306.x · Cited by 1,018
Topsoil foraging – an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability
Lynch, J. P., & Brown, K. M. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1013324727040 · Cited by 868
Self-citationRoot phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture
Lynch, J. P. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15738 · Cited by 774
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BONSER, A. M., LYNCH, J., & SNAPP, S.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-288
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2159636883
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in Phaseolus vulgaris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01847.x
- The paper
- BONSER, A. M., LYNCH, J., & SNAPP, S. (1996). Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in Phaseolus vulgaris. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01847.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.