Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uptake of aluminium by plant cells

RENGEL, ZDENKO·1996·New Phytologist

Abstract

SUMMARY: The question of intracellular or extracellular primary lesion in the Al toxicity syndrome is unresolved. One of the crucial points for answering that question is quantification of Al fluxes across the plasma membrane within seconds or minutes of exposure of roots to Al, i.e. concurrent with or preceding the first symptoms of Al toxicity. A review of the available literature on Al uptake shows that there is abundant information on Al accumulation in root tissues only after the relatively prolonged uptake period, ranging from 30 min to over 24 h. Most of these reports either assume or claim explicitly that intracellular Al was measured, even though Al ions are bound strongly to negative charges in the apoplasm. Therefore, an effective and complete desorption of apoplasmic Al after the uptake period is crucial for measurements of intracellular Al. However, published studies do not seem to have desorbed cell‐wall‐bound Al appropriately. Recent studies with giant algal cells of Chara corallina, where physical separation of cell wall and cytoplasm after the uptake period can be achieved surgically, showed that desorption of Al from the apoplasm, even employing a wider variety of desorbents and more stringent conditions than in any of the previously published reports, cannot be achieved completely within 5 h. Consequently, measured rates of uptake of Al across the plasma membrane of intact Chara cells employing the cell wall/cytoplasm separation technique are up to several orders of magnitude lower than previously published values in which cell‐wall Al was attributed to the transmembrane uptake component. Although there is no doubt that Al does cross the plasma membrane, no information exists about which Al species or complexes take part in the transmembrane flux, mainly because of complexities inherent in Al speciation at the solution/ion exchanger (i.e. the cell wall and the membrane) interface. Similarly, it is not known which membrane transporters are involved in transport of Al across the plasma membrane. The Al‐resistant plant genotypes generally accumulate less Al in the root tips than do the Al‐sensitive genotypes. No direct relationship, however, appears to exist between increased organic acid extrusion as a mechanism of resistance to Al and decreased transmembrane flux of Al. Al‐accumulator plant species accumulate relatively large amounts of Al in their tissues without having a greater Al uptake rate than non‐accumulator genotypes. Progress in deciphering structural and functional aspects of transport of Al across the plasma membrane of intact plant cells will rely on using giant algal cells in which physical separation of the cell wall and the cytoplasm can be achieved, because, at present, there is no reliable quantitative method which can overcome problems presented by a relatively large apoplasmic Al pool remaining after desorption of intact root cells of higher plants. CONTENTS Summary 389 I. Introduction 390 II. Toxicity symptoms and uptake of aluminium 390 III. Ionic speciation of aluminium 392 IV. Analytical techniques for measuring aluminium 393 V. Uptake of aluminium 395 VI. Localization of aluminium in cells and tissues 398 VII. Genotypic differences 400 VIII. Aluminium accumulators 401 IX. Future research 401 Acknowledgements 402 References 402

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
RENGEL, Z.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
389-406
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2024530894
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake of aluminium by plant cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x
The paper
RENGEL, Z. (1996). Uptake of aluminium by plant cells. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.