The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Results from 16 free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) sites representing four different global vegetation types indicate that only some early predictions of the effects of increasing CO 2 concentration (elevated [CO 2]) on plant and ecosystem processes are well supported. Predictions for leaf CO 2 assimilation (A net) generally fit our understanding of limitations to photosynthesis, and the FACE experiments indicate concurrent enhancement of photosynthesis and of partial downregulation. In addition, most herbaceous species had reduced leaf nitrogen (N)‐content under elevated [CO 2] and thus only a modest enhancement of A net, whereas most woody species had little change in leaf N with elevated [CO 2] but a larger enhancement of A net. Early predictions for primary production are more mixed. Predictions that enhancement of productivity would be greater in drier ecosystems or in drier years has only limited support. Furthermore, differences in productivity enhancements among six plant functional types were not significant. By contrast, increases in productivity enhancements with increased N availability are well supported by the FACE results. Thus, neither a resource‐based conceptual model nor a plant functional type conceptual model is exclusively supported by FACE results, but rather both species identity and resource availability are important factors influencing the response of ecosystems to elevated [CO 2]. Contents Summary 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Early assessments of [CO 2] responses in natural ecosystems 2 III. Global network of FACE sites 4 IV. Assimilation and leaf N‐content 5 V. Primary productivity 13 VI. Response of plant functional types 20 VII. Conclusions 23 Acknowledgements 24 References 24
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition
Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Tilman, D., Craine, J., Ellsworth, D., Tjoelker, M., Lee, T., Wedin, D., Naeem, S., Bahauddin, D., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35071062 · Cited by 609 · cited 6×
“2; Reich et al. (2001b) Table 1; D. S. Ellsworth (unpublished) Multi-factor experiment Production: Results averaged over 2 yr and diversity levels except for functional type results, which were for the low N treatment only Site name and abbreviation used in text Vegetation type Country: latitude,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x · Cited by 3,624
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp096 · Cited by 1,678
Hyvönen, R., Ågren, G. I., Linder, S., Persson, T., Cotrufo, M. F., Ekblad, A., Freeman, M., Grelle, A., Janssens, I. A., Jarvis, P. G., et al. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01967.x · Cited by 688
Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa willd and on soil-plant relations
Kammann, C. I., Linsel, S., Gößling, J. W., & Koyro, H.-W. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0771-5 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowak, R. S., Ellsworth, D. S., & Smith, S. D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-11
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-280
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2139223636
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 48.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01033.x
- The paper
- Nowak, R. S., Ellsworth, D. S., & Smith, S. D. (2004). Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01033.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.