The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reveal distinct patterns of anastomosis formation and hyphal healing mechanisms between different phylogenic groups
Open accessAbstract
The significance of anastomosis formation and the hyphal healing mechanism (HHM) for functionality and integrity of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal mycelial network remains poorly documented. Four Glomeraceae and three Gigasporaceae were cultured monoxenically. Anastomosis formation was assessed using the grid line method, while HHM was time-lapse monitored. In intact mycelial networks, the number of anastomosis per hyphal length was higher for Glomeraceae than for Gigasporaceae strains. Glomeraceae strains studied always formed anastomosis between different hyphae, whereas anastomosis in the Gigasporaceae more often concerned hyphal bridges within the same hyphae. In both families the HHM corresponded to a four-step process; first septum formation; second initiation of growing hyphal tips (GHTs); third GHT elongation, orientation and contact; and fourth GHT fusion and cytoplasmic/protoplasmic flux re-establishment. These four steps differentiated Glomeraceae from Gigasporaceae. The type and number of anastomosis per hyphal length, and the HHM differed considerably between Glomeraceae and Gigasporaceae families representing a supplementary character that distinguishes these two families and may be of significance in ecological studies of AM fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What determines growth direction in fungal hyphae?
Riquelme, M., Reynaga-Peña, C. G., Gierz, G., & Bartnicki-Garcı́a, S. (1998) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1006/fgbi.1998.1074 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
A trait-based framework to understand life history of mycorrhizal fungi
Chagnon, P.-L., Bradley, R. L., Maherali, H., & Klironomos, J. N. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.001 · Cited by 718
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: A review
Lenoir, I., Fontaine, J., & Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. (2016) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.01.002 · Cited by 437
Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation
Rillig, M. C., Aguilar‐Trigueros, C. A., Bergmann, J., Verbruggen, E., Veresoglou, S. D., & Lehmann, A. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13045 · Cited by 434
Owen, D., Williams, A. P., Griffith, G. W., & Withers, P. J. A. (2015) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.09.012 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- De La Providencia, I. E., De Souza, F. A., Fernández, F., Delmas, N. S., & Declerck, S.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-02
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 261-271
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2023764453
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reveal distinct patterns of anastomosis formation and hyphal healing mechanisms between different phylogenic groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01236.x
- The paper
- De La Providencia, I. E., De Souza, F. A., Fernández, F., Delmas, N. S., & Declerck, S. (2005). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reveal distinct patterns of anastomosis formation and hyphal healing mechanisms between different phylogenic groups. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01236.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.