Cited by 207Fungal and yeast genetics researchCellular Mechanics and InteractionsPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

What determines growth direction in fungal hyphae?

Riquelme, Meritxell, Reynaga-Peña, Cristina G., Gierz, Gerhard, Bartnicki-Garcı́a, Salomon·1998·Fungal Genetics and Biology

Abstract

We used high-resolution video microscopy and image analysis to map the trajectory of the Spitzenkörper in growing hyphae of Neurospora crassa and to correlate it with growth directionality. The Spitzenkörper followed a tortuous trajectory produced by a dominant forward motion accompanied by frequent, transverse oscillations. In hyphae with a fixed growth direction, the regression line of the Spitzenkörper trajectory corresponded to the longitudinal axis of the hypha. A permanent change in growth direction, i.e., the establishment of a new growth axis, was correlated with a sustained shift in Spitzenkörper trajectory away from the existing cell axis. In meandering hyphae, changes in growth directionality occurred somewhat erratically but there was a strong compensatory tendency reversing directional shifts and maintaining an overall fixed direction of growth. Although external factors greatly affect hyphal growth direction (tropisms), they are probably not the primary determinants of growth directionality. Inhibitors of microtubules, but not of actin microfilaments, caused hyphae to lose their growth directionality-providing support for the idea that Spitzenkörper trajectory is determined internally by a growing scaffolding of cytoplasmic microtubules. The meandering morphology of N. crassa hyphae was duplicated by computer simulation in support of the idea that hyphal morphogenesis is controlled by the position of the Spitzenkörper functioning as a vesicle supply center.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/fgbi.1998.1074

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riquelme, M., Reynaga-Peña, C. G., Gierz, G., & Bartnicki-Garcı́a, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
Fungal Genetics and Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
24
Issue
1-2
Pages
101-109
ISSN
1087-1845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010802329
Cited by
207
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fungal Genetics and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01gm048257-01)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-48257)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Spitzenkörper, Neurospora crassa, hyphal morphogenesis, microtubules, F-actin, hyphal tip growth
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Cytoskeleton, Fungi, Neurospora crassa, Microscopy, Video

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review