The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Based on empirical evidence from the literature we propose that, in nature, phenotypic plasticity in plants is usually expressed at a subindividual level. While reaction norms (i.e. the type and the degree of plant responses to environmental variation) are a property of genotypes, they are expressed at the level of modular subunits in most plants. We thus contend that phenotypic plasticity is not a whole‐plant response, but a property of individual meristems, leaves, branches and roots, triggered by local environmental conditions. Communication and behavioural integration of interconnected modules can change the local responses in different ways: it may enhance or diminish local plastic effects, thereby increasing or decreasing the differences between integrated modules exposed to different conditions. Modular integration can also induce qualitatively different responses, which are not expressed if all modules experience the same conditions. We propose that the response of a plant to its environment is the sum of all modular responses to their local conditions plus all interaction effects that are due to integration. The local response rules to environmental variation, and the modular interaction rules may be seen as evolving traits targeted by natural selection. Following this notion, whole‐plant reaction norms are an integrative by‐product of modular plasticity, which has far‐reaching methodological, ecological and evolutionary implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · Cited by 6,115
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Barthélémy, D., & Caraglio, Y. (2007) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcl260 · Cited by 984
What is Phenotypic Plasticity and Why is it Important?
Whitman, D., & Agrawal, A. (2009) · Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects · doi:10.1201/b10201-2 · Cited by 416
Freschet, G. T., Swart, E. M., & Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13352 · Cited by 384
Plant behaviour and communication
Karban, R. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- De Kroon, H., Huber, H., Stuefer, J. F., & Van Groenendael, J. M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-17
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2139590843
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01310.x
- The paper
- De Kroon, H., Huber, H., Stuefer, J. F., & Van Groenendael, J. M. (2005). A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01310.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.